1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00279802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell-free transcription of the nifH1 gene of Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus indicates that promoters of archaeal nif genes share basic features with the methanogen consensus promoter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, this element is most likely specific for this promoter. Mutational studies of Methanococcus nifHl promoter that directs expression of a subunit of an archaeal nitrogenase [41] and of Pyrococcus GDH promoter [38], confirmed the importance of a TATA box for promoter function.…”
Section: Promoter Signalsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, this element is most likely specific for this promoter. Mutational studies of Methanococcus nifHl promoter that directs expression of a subunit of an archaeal nitrogenase [41] and of Pyrococcus GDH promoter [38], confirmed the importance of a TATA box for promoter function.…”
Section: Promoter Signalsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…cus [41] and of the GDH promoter of Pyrococcus furiosus [38] were analysed. Beside these in vitro studies, a tRNA Lys promoter of Haloferax volcanii was analysed in vivo using a transcriptional reporter system [42].…”
Section: Promoter Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of the consensus sequence with results from other studies Previous studies applied site-directed mutagenesis to characterize promoters using in vitro transcription sytems from S. shibatae (Hain et a/., 1992; and M. vanielii (Hausner et al, 1991), and an in vivo sytem from H. volcanii (Palmer and Dennis, 1995). All but one of these studies (Gohl et a/., 1992) used stable RNA promoters. The resulting consensus sequences of three studies are included in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Consensus Sequence And Sequences Upstream mentioning
confidence: 99%