2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell-free DNA fetal fraction and preterm birth

Abstract: Elevated fetal fraction levels at 14.1-20.0 weeks' gestation were significantly associated with an increased incidence of preterm birth. Our findings warrant future exploration including validation in a larger, general population and investigation of the potential mechanisms that may be responsible for the initiation of preterm labor associated with increased fetal cell-free DNA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
55
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of five previous studies that measured cff‐DNA in the first trimester are consistent with the findings of our study in that no association exists between cff‐DNA and subsequent SPTB . Two other studies that focused on the second trimester also reached the same conclusion as our study …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of five previous studies that measured cff‐DNA in the first trimester are consistent with the findings of our study in that no association exists between cff‐DNA and subsequent SPTB . Two other studies that focused on the second trimester also reached the same conclusion as our study …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…One study found a highly significant association between SPTB and cff‐DNA levels above the 95th percentile in women undergoing fetal Rhesus D (RHD) genotype screening at 25 weeks of gestation . Other research showed that elevated levels of the fetal fraction of cell‐free DNA at 14.1 to 20.0 weeks of gestation were significantly associated with an increased incidence of preterm birth . Similar to our study, both of these reports studied the asymptomatic population in the second trimester, but they reached different conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In summary, while the pathogenesis of PE remains unclear, cffDNA may be a potential predictor of the disease prior to its onset. However, the latest meta‐analysis reveals that cffDNA is a relevant indicator primarily during the second trimester, and it is usually non‐specific and hard to detect earlier …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from genetic abnormalities of the fetus, cfDNA analysis allows monitoring pregnancy-related complications such as preeclampsia and preterm birth (13)(14)(15). In this case instead of a search for gene mutations, concentration of general cfDNA or fetal cfDNA in maternal plasma is analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%