2006
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell evolution and Earth history: stasis and revolution

Abstract: This synthesis has three main parts. The first discusses the overall tree of life and nature of the last common ancestor (cenancestor). I emphasize key steps in cellular evolution important for ordering and timing the major evolutionary innovations in the history of the biosphere, explaining especially the origins of the eukaryote cell and of bacterial flagella and cell envelope novelties. Second, I map the tree onto the fossil record and discuss dates of key events and their biogeochemical impact. Finally, I … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
282
1
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
(323 reference statements)
10
282
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…so far failed to provide strong support for any of the hypotheses for eukaryogenesis in common currency (Rivera & Lake 2004;Cavalier-Smith 2006).…”
Section: Conclusion Speculations and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…so far failed to provide strong support for any of the hypotheses for eukaryogenesis in common currency (Rivera & Lake 2004;Cavalier-Smith 2006).…”
Section: Conclusion Speculations and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origins of eukaryotic [Fe]-hydrogenase and PFO are also part of a bigger question concerning the origins of the eubacterial-like genes that encode much of eukaryote metabolism (Ribeiro & Golding 1998;Rivera et al 1998;Esser et al 2004). There are a number of imaginative hypotheses to explain these genes; as the product of multiple lateral transfers from different prokaryotes (Doolittle 1998), or the legacy of different eubacteria that participated in eukaryogenesis (Martin & Mü ller 1998;Moreira & LopezGarcia 1998;Rivera & Lake 2004;Cavalier-Smith 2006). Genomics coupled with more sophisticated phylogenetic analyses, should in principle be able to resolve gene origins, or at least reveal the limits of resolution that the data can provide (Penny et al 2001;Ho & Jermiin 2004;Roger & Hug 2006).…”
Section: Conclusion Speculations and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relative node ages were estimated using R8S 1.7 (Sanderson 2002) by rate-smoothing the ML tree using penalized likelihood and a log-smoothing parameter of 5, selected as optimal by cross-validation (Sanderson 2003). Absolute ages were estimated by setting the minimum and maximum age of the Chlorophyta-Streptophyta split at 700 and 1500 Ma, based on the fossil record and molecular clock estimates (Douzery et al 2004;Hedges et al 2004;Yoon et al 2004;Berney & Pawlowski 2006;Cavalier-Smith 2006;Roger & Hug 2006;Zimmer et al 2007;Herron et al 2009). …”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such eukaryotes originated probably between 800 and 1200 million years ago, 17 but prokaryotes have been present in the fossil record around 1500 million years earlier. 18 Lynn Margulis presented the theory by which eukaryotes form through endophagy of prokaryote algae to produce chloroplasts and bacteria to yield mitochondria, both examples of endosymbiosis. 19 So we should look for the origin of these eukaryote photopigments in prokaryote bacteria.…”
Section: Euglena and Chlamydomonasmentioning
confidence: 99%