Optical Biopsies and Microscopic Techniques 1996
DOI: 10.1117/12.260794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell damage in two-photon microscopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average power densities (0.2mW/mm 2 ) and pulse energy densities (0.04nJ/mm 2 ) used in TeFo imaging are $100x and $5x lower than the corresponding values for a DL PSF (20mW/mm 2 and 0.2nJ/mm 2 ). Reported safe power densities are in the range of 2-5mW/mm 2 and safe pulse energy densities are in the range of 0.025-0.06nJ/mm 2 (Ko ¨nig et al, 1997;Hopt and Neher, 2001). Thus, our conditions are more than an order of magnitude below both the established linear heat-induced damage threshold and the threshold for non-linear damage while at the same time being about 100x (average power density) and 5x (pulse energy density) lower than typical values for standard DL 2p scanning microscopy.…”
Section: Star+methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average power densities (0.2mW/mm 2 ) and pulse energy densities (0.04nJ/mm 2 ) used in TeFo imaging are $100x and $5x lower than the corresponding values for a DL PSF (20mW/mm 2 and 0.2nJ/mm 2 ). Reported safe power densities are in the range of 2-5mW/mm 2 and safe pulse energy densities are in the range of 0.025-0.06nJ/mm 2 (Ko ¨nig et al, 1997;Hopt and Neher, 2001). Thus, our conditions are more than an order of magnitude below both the established linear heat-induced damage threshold and the threshold for non-linear damage while at the same time being about 100x (average power density) and 5x (pulse energy density) lower than typical values for standard DL 2p scanning microscopy.…”
Section: Star+methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This imaging modality allowed research groups to pursue bioimaging at larger depths and excite samples in ultraviolet range with lesser phototoxicity (19,20). Instead of the traditional NADH excitation at 340-390nm, multiphoton excitation at 740nm-780nm was employed, which presented no toxicity (unlike the UV radiation) at moderate laser powers(<30mW)(21). Another advantage was that most multiphoton microscopes used a mode-locked laser which had excellent temporal instrument response function that helped FLIM to separate fluorescence signal from excitation laser.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique also allows deep penetration into tissues compared to other microscopic systems by using infrared wavelengths and minimizes photobleaching and damage compared to white light in confocal microscopy. Two-photon microscopy enables 3D fluorescence imaging of live cells of tissues or organs and allows for timelapse imaging of photosensitive samples with minimal phototoxicity over a long period 3,4,5 . It has been used to study the mechanism of glioblastoma cells in the tumor microenvironment, cellular interactions that contribute to biliary membrane integrity, and fast spatiotemporal cellular dynamics within neural networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%