1995
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.15.6.3129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell Cycle-Regulated Transcription of the CLB2 Gene Is Dependent on Mcm1 and a Ternary Complex Factor

Abstract: Clb2 is the major B-type mitotic cyclin required for entry into mitosis in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We showed that accumulation of CLB2 transcripts in G2 cells is controlled at the transcriptional level and identified a 55-bp upstream activating sequence (UAS) containing an Mcm1 binding site as being necessary and sufficient for cell cycle regulation. Sequences within the cell cycle-regulated UAS were shown to bind Mcm1 in vitro, and mutation which abolished Mcm1-dependent DNA binding activi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
90
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(61 reference statements)
3
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because Fkh1p and Fkh2p can have measurably different effects on the transcription of CLB2 in vivo, and because both proteins can bind this promoter in vivo (Koranda et al 2000;Kumar et al 2000), the relative occupancy of the CLB2 promoter by Fkh1p and Fkh2p is crucial for proper CLB2 expression. In addition, Fkh2p, but not Fkh1p, is a component of SFF (Swi five factor) (Koranda et al 2000;Kumar et al 2000;Pic et al 2000;Zhu et al 2000), a partially characterized protein complex that binds to promoters of genes in the CLB2 cluster at sites required for their cell cycle-regulated transcription (Lydall et al 1991;Althoefer et al 1995;Maher et al 1995). Consistent with this observation, Fkh2p occupies CLB2-cluster promoters in vivo more efficiently than Fkh1p (Koranda et al 2000;Kumar et al 2000).…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because Fkh1p and Fkh2p can have measurably different effects on the transcription of CLB2 in vivo, and because both proteins can bind this promoter in vivo (Koranda et al 2000;Kumar et al 2000), the relative occupancy of the CLB2 promoter by Fkh1p and Fkh2p is crucial for proper CLB2 expression. In addition, Fkh2p, but not Fkh1p, is a component of SFF (Swi five factor) (Koranda et al 2000;Kumar et al 2000;Pic et al 2000;Zhu et al 2000), a partially characterized protein complex that binds to promoters of genes in the CLB2 cluster at sites required for their cell cycle-regulated transcription (Lydall et al 1991;Althoefer et al 1995;Maher et al 1995). Consistent with this observation, Fkh2p occupies CLB2-cluster promoters in vivo more efficiently than Fkh1p (Koranda et al 2000;Kumar et al 2000).…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…Our in vitro analysis revealed two biochemical differences between Fkh1p and Fkh2p. First, purified Fkh2p, but not Fkh1p, could bind cooperatively with itself, and second, Fkh2p, but not Fkh1p, could bind cooperatively with Mcm1p, a second gene regulatory protein required for transcription of genes in the CLB2 cluster (Lydall et al 1991;Althoefer et al 1995;Maher et al 1995). The latter difference provided an explanation for the differences in relative promoter-occupancy by Fkh1p and Fkh2p at a variety of promoters in vivo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mcml is also required for transcription of the G2-specific transcripts (Lydall et al 1991;Althoefer et al 1995;Maher et al 1995), which are transcribed immediately before the wave of ECB-activated transcription (see Fig. 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These elements are responsible for G2/M-specific expression through the mitotic cell cycle (Althoefer et al, 1995;Maher et al, 1995;Koranda et al, 2000;Kumar et al, 2000;Pic et al, 2000). Mcm1p recruits the forkhead transcription factor Fkh2p and this complex remains bound to promoters throughout the cell cycle (Althoefer et al, 1995;Hollenhorst et al, 2000;Koranda et al, 2000;Kumar et al, 2000;Pic et al, 2000;Zhu et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%