2010
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell Cycle Progression or Translation Control Is Not Essential for Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Oncolysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Abstract: The intrinsic oncolytic specificity of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) is currently being exploited to develop alternative therapeutic strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Identifying key regulators in diverse transduction pathways that define VSV oncolysis in cancer cells represents a fundamental prerequisite to engineering more effective oncolytic viral vectors and adjusting combination therapies. After having identified defects in the signalling cascade of type I interferon induction, responsible… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many cancer cell types, specific genes associated with type I IFN signaling are transcriptionally downregulated or functionally inactive (Balachandran and Barber, 2004; Marozin et al, 2008; Marozin et al, 2010; Moussavi et al, 2010; Zhang et al, 2010). Also, type I IFN mediated responses can be inhibited by MEK/ERK signaling, which is often upregulated in cancer cells (Noser et al, 2007), or by epigenetic silencing of IFN responsive transcription factors IRF7 or IRF5 (Li and Tainsky, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cancer cell types, specific genes associated with type I IFN signaling are transcriptionally downregulated or functionally inactive (Balachandran and Barber, 2004; Marozin et al, 2008; Marozin et al, 2010; Moussavi et al, 2010; Zhang et al, 2010). Also, type I IFN mediated responses can be inhibited by MEK/ERK signaling, which is often upregulated in cancer cells (Noser et al, 2007), or by epigenetic silencing of IFN responsive transcription factors IRF7 or IRF5 (Li and Tainsky, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oncoselectivity of VSV is mainly based on defective or reduced type I IFN responses in cancer cells (Barber, 2004; Lichty et al, 2004; Stojdl et al, 2000b, 2003) as these responses are generally anti-proliferative, anti-angiogenic, and pro-apoptotic (Wang et al, 2011), and therefore unfavorable for tumor formation. Downregulation or inactivation of specific genes associated with type I IFN responses (such as PKR, IRF3, or IFN receptor) were shown in some cancer types (Balachandran and Barber, 2004; Marozin et al, 2008, 2010; Moussavi et al, 2010; Zhang et al, 2010). IFN signaling can also be inhibited by MEK/ERK signaling (Noser et al, 2007) or by epigenetic silencing of IFN responsive transcription factors IRF7 or IRF5 (Li and Tainsky, 2011).…”
Section: Replicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9). Indeed, altered expression of these cell-cycle regulatory proteins is associated with HCC growth (31)(32)(33). Although S-phase progression can also be modulated by CDK2/cyclin E, effects on cell growth after inhibition of TUC338 were noted in Huh7 cells, which do not express p21 and cyclin E (34-36), making it unlikely that the effects of TUC338 on cell-cycle progression involved these proteins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%