2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2019.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell culture distribution in a three-dimensional porous scaffold in perfusion bioreactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to static seeding, dynamic seeding methods, which apply an external force to facilitate cell penetration, such as flow perfusion, centrifugation, orbital shaking, and spinner flask, have shown to result in better cell distribution on scaffolds fabricated with conventional techniques [15][16][17][18][19] . Moreover, culture of these 3D scaffolds in perfusion bioreactors after static seeding has also demonstrated to enhance cell distribution and tissue formation [20] . However the use of bioreactors require specific lab equipment and expertise, and perfusion flow right after seeding results in significant decrease in cell number in AM 3D scaffolds [21] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to static seeding, dynamic seeding methods, which apply an external force to facilitate cell penetration, such as flow perfusion, centrifugation, orbital shaking, and spinner flask, have shown to result in better cell distribution on scaffolds fabricated with conventional techniques [15][16][17][18][19] . Moreover, culture of these 3D scaffolds in perfusion bioreactors after static seeding has also demonstrated to enhance cell distribution and tissue formation [20] . However the use of bioreactors require specific lab equipment and expertise, and perfusion flow right after seeding results in significant decrease in cell number in AM 3D scaffolds [21] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With perfusion and sparse 3D structures, cells survived for 6 weeks [ 62 ] or even for as long as 98 days [ 78 ]. Medium perfusion in the structure [ 79 ] or porous substrates [ 80 , 81 ] allowed a uniform distribution of nutrients and oxygen, with a consequent high viability of cells in the whole structure being observed for a lengthy cultivation period. Cell survival was optimal regardless of its location, whether on channel walls or within a hydrogel [ 82 ].…”
Section: Cellular In Vitro Cardiac Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These also usually employ either one or two reservoirs to provide a supply of medium, which allows either recirculation of the same medium or a constant supply of fresh medium. A wide range of different systems have been designed, incorporating different cell supports such as porous membranes [45] , synthetic or extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds [46] , [47] , [48] and hydrogels [ 49 , 50 ]. An advantage of these systems is the ease of incorporating them into standard static 3D culture methods, allowing complex tissue equivalents to readily be perfused with medium without needing to simplify other aspects of the culture, as has been demonstrated with full-thickness skin equivalents [ 51 , 52 ].…”
Section: Bioreactor Design and Usagementioning
confidence: 99%