2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10495-006-0045-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell culture density dependent toxicity and chromatin changes upon cadmium treatment in murine pre-B-cells

Abstract: Murine pre-B-cells grown in the presence of lower (1 microM) or higher (5 microM) concentration of cadmium chloride were separated into 13 fractions by centrifugal elutriation. The rate of DNA synthesis after cadmium treatment determined in permeable cells was dependent on cell culture density during cadmium treatment. Cell cycle analysis revealed a shift in the profile of DNA synthesis from replicative to repair DNA synthesis upon cadmium treatment. The study of the relationship between cell culture density a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the potential to distinguish among different chromatotoxic effects is of diagnostic significance, we have started to determine and systematize the effects of cadmium treatment [12], gamma irradiation [13]. Genotoxic treatments may have multiple effects on different cell lines, therefore we have used two cell lines (Chinese hamster ovary cells and murine preB cells) for cadmium treatment and have seen the same large extensive disruptions and holes in the nuclear membrane and sticky incompletely folded chromosomes typical for cadmium treatment [13,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the potential to distinguish among different chromatotoxic effects is of diagnostic significance, we have started to determine and systematize the effects of cadmium treatment [12], gamma irradiation [13]. Genotoxic treatments may have multiple effects on different cell lines, therefore we have used two cell lines (Chinese hamster ovary cells and murine preB cells) for cadmium treatment and have seen the same large extensive disruptions and holes in the nuclear membrane and sticky incompletely folded chromosomes typical for cadmium treatment [13,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromatin changes induced by cadmium treatment were markedly different from those seen after c-irradiation, but cadmium-induced chromatin changes were the same in different cells. Apoptotic chromatin changes in chromatin structure after cadmium treatment were seen as large extensive disruptions, holes in the nuclear membrane and stickiness of incompletely folded chromosomes [26,27]. After c-irradiation the cellular and nuclear sizes were inceased, the DNA content was lower in each elutriated subpopulation of cells, the progression of cell cycle was arrested in early S phase, the chromatin condensation was blocked between the fibrillary chromatin and precondensed elongated chromosome forms and the number and size of apoptotic bodies were inversely correlated with the progression of the cell cycle [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To induce apoptosis, similar concentrations for Pb treatment were applied as earlier when the apoptotic agent was Cd (Banfalvi et al, 2007b). HaCaT cells at about 80% confluence were grown for 15 h, and then 1 mM Pb(NO 3 ) 2 was added to the cell culture and cells were grown further for 9 h. Photographs were taken after 1 day every minute.…”
Section: Apoptosis Induced By Low Concentration Of Pbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By performing cell cycle synchronization using high resolution of centrifugal elutriation (Banfalvi, 2008a), we could distinguish typical damaged chromatin forms from normal structures in those cells that have undergone apoptosis (Banfalvi et al, 2005(Banfalvi et al, , 2006(Banfalvi et al, , 2007a(Banfalvi et al, , 2007bUjvarosi et al, 2007;Banfalvi, 2008bBanfalvi, , 2009). The morphological investigations of apoptosis, which are based primarily on microscopy (Kerr et al, 1995;Gorman et al, 1996;Kravtsov et al, 1999), grasped only moments of the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%