2018
DOI: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2018.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell biology at the interface of nanobiosensors and microfluidics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One promising field is biosensing technology that seeks to combine current conventional methods with lab‐on‐chip devices to facilitate EV analysis. Biosensors are analytical instruments that detect and/or quantify biomarkers by producing signals related to the concentration of an analyte (Bhalla et al, 2018 ). These biosensors are composed of a biological receptor that provides specificity and a transducer that converts biological signals into electrical data (Naresh & Lee, 2021 ).…”
Section: Future Directions For Ev Isolation and Ch...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One promising field is biosensing technology that seeks to combine current conventional methods with lab‐on‐chip devices to facilitate EV analysis. Biosensors are analytical instruments that detect and/or quantify biomarkers by producing signals related to the concentration of an analyte (Bhalla et al, 2018 ). These biosensors are composed of a biological receptor that provides specificity and a transducer that converts biological signals into electrical data (Naresh & Lee, 2021 ).…”
Section: Future Directions For Ev Isolation and Ch...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the molecular binding at the sensor's surface leads to a refractive index change. 265 For example, Roether et al integrated mushroom-shaped plasmonic nanostructures into a microfluidic channel and monitored the realtime DNA polymerase activity in a label-free manner. 266 Another attractive label-free biosensing technique is the quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), which can sense the mass variation originating from molecular binding.…”
Section: ■ Sample Extraction and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) techniques have been developed for label-free biosensing applications. Typically, the molecular binding at the sensor’s surface leads to a refractive index change . For example, Roether et al.…”
Section: Amplification-free Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These strategies rely on the direct detection of receptor–analyte reactions occurring on recognition elements such as metallic thin films, nanostructures, or field-effect transistors by monitoring localized changes in absorbance wavelengths or electronic transduction proportional to the changes in surface mass adsorption . The most commonly used label-free detection strategies rely on optical sensing of mass dependent surface electron resonance energy changes using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, surface plasmon resonance, and localized surface plasmon resonance sensors, or direct detection of mass variation using quartz crystal microbalance. In addition to optical detection techniques, high sensitivity field-effect transistors have enabled the development of ultrasensitive electrochemical analyte detection systems with LoDs in the low attomolar to zeptomolar ranges. , …”
Section: Detection Of Receptor–analyte Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%