Cell-based therapies have disease-modifying effects on osteoarthritis in animal models. A systematic review by the ESSKA Orthobiologic Initiative. Part 1: adipose tissue-derived cell-based injectable therapies
Abstract:Purpose
The aim of this systematic review was to determine if adipose tissue-derived cell-based injectable therapies can induce disease-modifying effects in joints affected by osteoarthritis (OA).
Methods
A systematic review was performed on three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase) according to PRISMA guidelines. A synthesis of the results was performed investigating disease-modifying effects in preclinical studies comparing injectable a… Show more
“…31 Meanwhile, preclinical models have documented evidence of the disease-modifying effects of ADMSCs for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in macroscopic, histologic, and immunohistochemical evaluations. 42 According to preclinical studies, the promising effects of ADMSCs could skew the biochemical environment of osteoarthritis into regenerative and anti-inflammatory conditions via paracrine effects. 11,23,40,42 A recent midterm clinical study showed significant improvement in cartilage changes between 2 and 3 years after a single IA injection of ADMSCs based on serial MRI evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 According to preclinical studies, the promising effects of ADMSCs could skew the biochemical environment of osteoarthritis into regenerative and anti-inflammatory conditions via paracrine effects. 11,23,40,42 A recent midterm clinical study showed significant improvement in cartilage changes between 2 and 3 years after a single IA injection of ADMSCs based on serial MRI evaluation. 32 Thus, structural cartilage improvement requires a longer follow-up to reflect the regenerative and chondroprotective effects of ADMSCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,31,51 In experimental models, ADMSC-based therapies have shown consistent evidence of disease-modifying effects for the treatment of osteoarthritis based on a recent systematic review of preclinical studies. 42 However, clinical evidence of ADMSCbased therapies remains limited. 18,22 In 2019, a phase IIb clinical randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an intra-articular (IA) injection of autologous high-dose ADMSCs (1 3 10 8 cells) demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of this treatment for knee osteoarthritis at 6-month follow-up in an outpatient setting, with results of pain relief and functional improvement without structural aggravation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,31,51 In experimental models, ADMSC-based therapies have shown consistent evidence of disease-modifying effects for the treatment of osteoarthritis based on a recent systematic review of preclinical studies. 42 However, clinical evidence of ADMSC-based therapies remains limited. 18,22…”
Background: Intra-articular injection of autologous culture-expanded adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) has introduced a promising treatment option for knee osteoarthritis. Although the clinical efficacy and safety of ADMSCs have been reported, the treatment remains controversial owing to the small sample sizes and heterogeneous osteoarthritis grades in previous studies. Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of ADMSCs as compared with placebo in alleviating pain and improving functional capacity in a large sample of patients with knee osteoarthritis of Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade 3. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: This phase III multicenter clinical trial was a double-blind randomized controlled study that included 261 patients with K-L grade 3 symptomatic knee osteoarthritis who were administered a single injection of autologous culture-expanded ADMSCs or placebo. Clinical data were assessed at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after the injection. The primary endpoints were improvements in 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) for function at 6 months after the injection. The secondary endpoints included clinical and radiologic examinations and safety after injection. The changes in cartilage defects after injection were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months. Results: The ADMSC and control groups included 125 and 127 patients available for follow-up, respectively. At 6 months, the ADMSC group showed significantly better improvements in 100-mm VAS (ADMSC vs control, 25.2 vs 15.5; P = .004) and total WOMAC score (21.7 vs 14.3; P = .002) as compared with the control group. The linear mixed model analysis indicated significantly better improvements in all clinical outcomes in the ADMSC group after 6 months. At 6 months, the ADMSC group achieved significantly higher proportions of patients above the minimal clinically important difference in 100-mm VAS and WOMAC score. Radiologic outcomes and adverse events did not demonstrate significant differences between the groups. No serious treatment-related adverse events were observed. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed no significant difference in change of cartilage defects between the groups at 6 months. Conclusion: Intra-articular injection of autologous culture-expanded ADMSCs provided significant pain relief and functional improvements in patients with K-L grade 3 osteoarthritis. Long-term results are needed to determine the disease-modifying effects of ADMSCs, such as structural changes, and the duration of effect of intra-articular injection of ADMSCs in knee osteoarthritis. Registration: NCT03990805 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
“…31 Meanwhile, preclinical models have documented evidence of the disease-modifying effects of ADMSCs for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in macroscopic, histologic, and immunohistochemical evaluations. 42 According to preclinical studies, the promising effects of ADMSCs could skew the biochemical environment of osteoarthritis into regenerative and anti-inflammatory conditions via paracrine effects. 11,23,40,42 A recent midterm clinical study showed significant improvement in cartilage changes between 2 and 3 years after a single IA injection of ADMSCs based on serial MRI evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 According to preclinical studies, the promising effects of ADMSCs could skew the biochemical environment of osteoarthritis into regenerative and anti-inflammatory conditions via paracrine effects. 11,23,40,42 A recent midterm clinical study showed significant improvement in cartilage changes between 2 and 3 years after a single IA injection of ADMSCs based on serial MRI evaluation. 32 Thus, structural cartilage improvement requires a longer follow-up to reflect the regenerative and chondroprotective effects of ADMSCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,31,51 In experimental models, ADMSC-based therapies have shown consistent evidence of disease-modifying effects for the treatment of osteoarthritis based on a recent systematic review of preclinical studies. 42 However, clinical evidence of ADMSCbased therapies remains limited. 18,22 In 2019, a phase IIb clinical randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an intra-articular (IA) injection of autologous high-dose ADMSCs (1 3 10 8 cells) demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of this treatment for knee osteoarthritis at 6-month follow-up in an outpatient setting, with results of pain relief and functional improvement without structural aggravation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,31,51 In experimental models, ADMSC-based therapies have shown consistent evidence of disease-modifying effects for the treatment of osteoarthritis based on a recent systematic review of preclinical studies. 42 However, clinical evidence of ADMSC-based therapies remains limited. 18,22…”
Background: Intra-articular injection of autologous culture-expanded adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) has introduced a promising treatment option for knee osteoarthritis. Although the clinical efficacy and safety of ADMSCs have been reported, the treatment remains controversial owing to the small sample sizes and heterogeneous osteoarthritis grades in previous studies. Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of ADMSCs as compared with placebo in alleviating pain and improving functional capacity in a large sample of patients with knee osteoarthritis of Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade 3. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: This phase III multicenter clinical trial was a double-blind randomized controlled study that included 261 patients with K-L grade 3 symptomatic knee osteoarthritis who were administered a single injection of autologous culture-expanded ADMSCs or placebo. Clinical data were assessed at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after the injection. The primary endpoints were improvements in 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) for function at 6 months after the injection. The secondary endpoints included clinical and radiologic examinations and safety after injection. The changes in cartilage defects after injection were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months. Results: The ADMSC and control groups included 125 and 127 patients available for follow-up, respectively. At 6 months, the ADMSC group showed significantly better improvements in 100-mm VAS (ADMSC vs control, 25.2 vs 15.5; P = .004) and total WOMAC score (21.7 vs 14.3; P = .002) as compared with the control group. The linear mixed model analysis indicated significantly better improvements in all clinical outcomes in the ADMSC group after 6 months. At 6 months, the ADMSC group achieved significantly higher proportions of patients above the minimal clinically important difference in 100-mm VAS and WOMAC score. Radiologic outcomes and adverse events did not demonstrate significant differences between the groups. No serious treatment-related adverse events were observed. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed no significant difference in change of cartilage defects between the groups at 6 months. Conclusion: Intra-articular injection of autologous culture-expanded ADMSCs provided significant pain relief and functional improvements in patients with K-L grade 3 osteoarthritis. Long-term results are needed to determine the disease-modifying effects of ADMSCs, such as structural changes, and the duration of effect of intra-articular injection of ADMSCs in knee osteoarthritis. Registration: NCT03990805 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
“…Cavallo et al reported that bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) obtained from the iliac crest and proximal tibia presents the potential for osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation as well as mesenchymal marker expression [9]. Perucca Orfei C et al reported in a systematic review that injectable adipose‐derived cell‐based therapies showed positive effects on joint tissues in animal osteoarthritis models, provided a structural/macroscopic improvement in both the cartilage and synovial membrane properties compared to untreated osteoarthritis joints and reduced the serum and synovial fluid levels of cartilage destruction markers [22].…”
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the safety and eicacy of intra-knee stromal vascular fraction (SVF) injection in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis at the midterm (3-year) follow-up. Methods SVF injection was applied to 25 knees of 20 patients. Eighteen patients (90%) were female, and the means ± standard deviations of age was 61.9 ± 7.8 (range, 50-76) years. Patients who received conservative treatment for at least 6 months and had radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grades 2 and 3 varus gonarthrosis were included in the study. SVF was obtained from the umbilical region by liposuction using local anaesthesia. Patients were followed-up for 36 months. Their visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Lysholm scores were evaluated before and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-SVF injection. Results A statistically signiicant improvement (p < 0.05) was observed in VAS, WOMAC and Lysholm scores at the irst 2-year follow-up compared to baseline. However, no statistically signiicant diference (n.s.) was observed in VAS, WOMAC and Lysholm scores at the 3-year follow-up compared with baseline. Conclusion Intra-articular SVF injection decreased pain and signiicantly improved the functional outcomes in the irst 2 years in knees with grade 2-3 osteoarthritis; however, these positive efects of the injection disappeared in the 3rd year. Although short-term successful results of SVF have been reported in the literature, prospective studies are needed for medium-and long-term results.
PurposeAim of this systematic review of preclinical evidence was to determine the effects of intra‐articular corticosteroid (CS) injections in joints affected by osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsA systematic review was performed on animal studies evaluating intra‐articular CS injections for OA joints. The search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. A synthesis of the results was performed investigating CS effects by evaluating studies comparing CS with control groups. Morphological, histological, immunohistochemistry evaluations, clinical outcomes, biomarkers and imaging results were evaluated. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation's tool.ResultsThirty‐two articles analysing CS effects in OA animal models were included (1079 joints), 18 studies on small and 14 on large animals. CS injections showed overall positive effects in at least one of the outcomes in 68% of the studies, while 16% reported a deleterious effect. CS improved cartilage and synovial outcomes in 68% and 60% of the studies, but detrimental effects were documented in 11% and 20% of the studies, respectively. Clinical parameters evaluated in terms of pain, lameness or joint swelling improved in 63% of the studies but deteriorated in 13%. Evidence is limited on imaging and biomarkers results, as well as on the best CS type, dose, formulation and injection protocol. The risk of bias assessment revealed a 28% low and an 18% high risk of bias.ConclusionIntra‐articular CS injections induced a wide range of results on OA joints in experimental animal models, from disease‐modifying and positive effects on pain and joint function at short‐term evaluation to the lack of benefit or even negative effects. This underlines the need to identify more specific indications and treatment modalities to avoid possible detrimental effects while maximising the anti‐inflammatory properties and the benefits of intra‐articular CS in OA joints.Level of EvidenceLevel II.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.