1994
DOI: 10.1267/ahc.27.287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell and Tissue Distribution of Lysosomal Cysteine Proteinases, Cathepsins B, H, and L, and their Biological Roles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the discrepancy between these two results has not been explained, Dittmer et al (1997) have suggested that other parameters, including the structure of the underlying oligosaccharides, the position of the phosphorylated mannose residues within the oligosaccharides, and the polypeptide backbone, would determine the affinity of the enzyme for the two MPRs. When we consider these notions, our present results could indicate that the difference in affinity of the two MPRs for each lysosomal enzyme contributes to the different distribution patterns of the MPRs, because lysosomal enzymes also show heterogeneous distribution patterns depending on enzymes, cells, and tissues (Uchiyama et al 1994). However, more information concerning differences in the oligosaccharide modification and the phosphorylation state of lysosomal enzymes for several types of cells and tissues will be needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Although the discrepancy between these two results has not been explained, Dittmer et al (1997) have suggested that other parameters, including the structure of the underlying oligosaccharides, the position of the phosphorylated mannose residues within the oligosaccharides, and the polypeptide backbone, would determine the affinity of the enzyme for the two MPRs. When we consider these notions, our present results could indicate that the difference in affinity of the two MPRs for each lysosomal enzyme contributes to the different distribution patterns of the MPRs, because lysosomal enzymes also show heterogeneous distribution patterns depending on enzymes, cells, and tissues (Uchiyama et al 1994). However, more information concerning differences in the oligosaccharide modification and the phosphorylation state of lysosomal enzymes for several types of cells and tissues will be needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This report strongly indicates a different role of Cath H from those of Cath B and Cath L. In fact, contrary to Cath H, the overexpression of Cath B and Cath L has been reported in lung tumours as well as in several other studies of aetiologically different cancers (reviewed by Kos et al, 1998). Although Cath B, L and H are all lysosomal cysteine peptidases, large variations in expression of individual cathepsins in different tissues (Qian et al, 1991) and even in different types of cells within the same tissue (Uchiyama et al, 1994) have been reported. Selective expression of individual peptidases in different types of tumour suggest that they may participate in specialized cellular functions (San Segundo et al, 1986;Chapman et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lysosomes, as an acidic compartment with limiting membranes, are ubiquitous in all animal cells and play an important role in the maintenance of the cellular metabolic turnover by degrading unneeded intra-and extracellular materials into biological monomers which are then reutilized by the cells (UCHIYAMA et al, 1994). Cathepsins B and D are representative cysteine and aspartic proteinases in lysosomes of mammalian cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%