2019
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201800227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell Adhesion Structures in Epithelial Cells Are Formed in Dynamic and Cooperative Ways

Abstract: There are many morphologically distinct membrane structures with different functions at the surface of epithelial cells. Among these, adherens junctions (AJ) and tight junctions (TJ) are responsible for the mechanical linkage of epithelial cells and epithelial barrier function, respectively. In the process of new cell-cell adhesion formation between two epithelial cells, such as after wounding, AJ form first and then TJ form on the apical side of AJ. This process is very complicated because AJ formation trigge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, this LUZP1‐based mechanism sheds new light on the importance of the association between TJs and CRs for vertebrate apical constriction. TJs are vertebrate‐specific junctions that are not only crucial for paracellular barriers with selective paracellular permeability, but also as signaling hubs regulating a variety of cellular events (Tsukita et al , 2001; Raleigh et al , 2011; Krug et al , 2014; Suzuki et al , 2014; Tamura & Tsukita, 2014; Saitoh et al , 2015; Tanaka et al , 2015, 2016; Zihni et al , 2016; Tanaka et al , 2017; Odenwald et al , 2018; Tanaka et al , 2018; Citi, 2019; Nakamura et al , 2019; Shigetomi & Ikenouchi, 2019; Tsukita et al , 2019b). Notably, in the context of TJ maturation, the association between actomyosin CRs and TJs is known to be important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, this LUZP1‐based mechanism sheds new light on the importance of the association between TJs and CRs for vertebrate apical constriction. TJs are vertebrate‐specific junctions that are not only crucial for paracellular barriers with selective paracellular permeability, but also as signaling hubs regulating a variety of cellular events (Tsukita et al , 2001; Raleigh et al , 2011; Krug et al , 2014; Suzuki et al , 2014; Tamura & Tsukita, 2014; Saitoh et al , 2015; Tanaka et al , 2015, 2016; Zihni et al , 2016; Tanaka et al , 2017; Odenwald et al , 2018; Tanaka et al , 2018; Citi, 2019; Nakamura et al , 2019; Shigetomi & Ikenouchi, 2019; Tsukita et al , 2019b). Notably, in the context of TJ maturation, the association between actomyosin CRs and TJs is known to be important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, in vivo evidence weighs against actin stress fibers mediating endothelial cell retraction, barrier breakdown, and gap formation in postcapillary venules in vivo [102,110]. However, the cortical actin cytoskeleton is likely to contribute to the formation of finger-like processes next to gaps, maintain cell-cell contacts during gap formation, and promote gap closure, adherens junction reformation, and resolution of leakage [111].…”
Section: Box 3 Mechanism Of Action Of Permeability Modulators: Open mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above pathological changes eventually result in a profound inflammatory immune response, and in turn, worsening the damage of intestinal mucosa [10,11]. Tight junctions are composed by a series of transmembrane proteins including the claudins, occludins, junctional adhesion molecules with immunoglobulin-like domains, and intracellular scaffold proteins (i.e., zonula occludens) [12]. Tight junctions are pivotal in regulating intestinal permeability and maintaining intestinal barrier integrity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%