2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2020.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Celiac disease risk stratification based on HLA-DQ heterodimer (HLA-DQA1 ~ DQB1) typing in a large cohort of adults with suspected celiac disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the DQ haplotype has been associated with CeD in many populations, there has been controversy about the DQ2.2 haplotype, with some early studies identifying a linkage of the haplotype with CeD. A recent analysis of a large number of samples received in a clinical laboratory confirms the absence of a linkage between DQ2.2 and CeD 5 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While the DQ haplotype has been associated with CeD in many populations, there has been controversy about the DQ2.2 haplotype, with some early studies identifying a linkage of the haplotype with CeD. A recent analysis of a large number of samples received in a clinical laboratory confirms the absence of a linkage between DQ2.2 and CeD 5 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the HLA‐DQ type was previously determined serologically using antibodies, it is now customary to genotype HLA‐DQB1 or the HLA‐DQA1 ~ DQB1 loci and use that information to assign the serotype by imputation. HLA‐DQ heterodimer (HLA‐DQA1 ~ DQB1) typing has been used to assess CeD risk in a large sample of patients with CeD 5 . The highest risk for CeD was associated with HLA‐DQ2.5, which is formed by the HLA‐DQA1*05:XX ~ DQB1*02:01 5–8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Selecting an optimal screening strategy is complicated by a wide variation in the reported family risk 14‐16 possibly due to different poorly defined patient‐ and relative‐related individual factors, such as age at screening, gender, HLA haplogenotype and degree of consanquinity 1,16‐23 . Limited data on these factors make optimal timing of screening, testing of other than FDRs, and the benefits of genetic risk stratification debatable 13,15,16,23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%