2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam activity against β-lactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales clinical isolates from U.S. medical centres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CZA was demonstrated to be effective and have a better safety profile compared to the best available therapy (BAT) in OXA-48 infections; results were comparable to those observed in Enterobacterales infections due to KPC producers [ 27 ]. Hirsh and colleagues tried out CZA and ceftolozane/tazobactam against a collection of P. aeruginosa , obtaining outstanding results: both drugs were active in >80% of β-lactam resistant isolates (75% meropenem non-susceptible) and on 88% of DTR- Pa [ 28 ]. In an investigation in 360 P. aeruginosa strains, CZA was the most active compound against meropenem- and imipenem-resistant strains (92.6% and 93.8% susceptible, respectively) [ 29 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CZA was demonstrated to be effective and have a better safety profile compared to the best available therapy (BAT) in OXA-48 infections; results were comparable to those observed in Enterobacterales infections due to KPC producers [ 27 ]. Hirsh and colleagues tried out CZA and ceftolozane/tazobactam against a collection of P. aeruginosa , obtaining outstanding results: both drugs were active in >80% of β-lactam resistant isolates (75% meropenem non-susceptible) and on 88% of DTR- Pa [ 28 ]. In an investigation in 360 P. aeruginosa strains, CZA was the most active compound against meropenem- and imipenem-resistant strains (92.6% and 93.8% susceptible, respectively) [ 29 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CZA is the preferred choice and CFDC may represent a reasonable alternative [ 113 ]. Ceftolozane/tazobactam and CZA demonstrated optimal efficacy for DTR- Pa [ 28 ] and CFDC represents again another reasonable treatment option [ 113 ]. MBL-producing bacteria are an increasingly expanding threat, but treatment possibilities remain an unmet medical need.…”
Section: Algorithm Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the frequency of CMY is lower than that of ESBL, it is clinically significant because when combined with the loss of porins (OmpC, OmpF), it can confer resistance to carbapenems, one of the last-line antibiotics for the treatment of infections [ 46 ]. On the other hand, CMY enzymes have relevance in resistance to recently introduced antimicrobials, for instance in a study carried out in centers in USA; two E. coli isolates were found, in which genes encoding the CTX-M-15 and CMY-2-like beta-lactamases coexisted; both isolates were resistant to ceftolozane-tazobactam with MIC 64 µg/mL and 128 µg/mL, respectively [ 47 ]. The existence of these two mechanisms of resistance in the same isolate can complicate the interpretation of the antibiogram and, consequently, the proper selection of antimicrobial treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About one-fourth of the isolates (n = 14) were classified as extensively drug resistant, and of these, 71.4% and 57.1% were susceptible to ceftazidimeavibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam, respectively. 41 A retrospective observational study involving 20 US health systems (205 patients) concluded that ceftolozanetazobactam is an effective monotherapy for MDR P aeruginosa strains. Patients were required to have a MDR P aeruginosa isolate and to have received ceftolozane-tazobactam for at least 24 hours.…”
Section: Ceftolozane-tazobactammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About one-fourth of the isolates (n = 14) were classified as extensively drug resistant, and of these, 71.4% and 57.1% were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam, respectively. 41…”
Section: Newer Cephalosporin-bli Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%