2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40121-021-00479-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Combination with In Vitro Non-susceptible Antimicrobials Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Monotherapy in Critically Ill Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract: Background: No clinical study has investigated the use of ceftazidime-avibactam combination schemes with an in vitro non-susceptible antimicrobial that could be superior to ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study at two tertiary hospitals in China for patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection treated with ceftazidimeavibactam for at least 72 h. A Cox proportional hazards regression model wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(67 reference statements)
6
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study of bloodstream infections caused by CRKP, 25 early initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy was associated with lower 30-day mortality. A study by Zheng et al 26 found that CAZ-AVI combined with in vitro insensitive drugs significantly reduced the 30-day mortality in CRKP-infected patients compared with CAZ-AVI alone, which is consistent with our findings. In a model of Galleria Mellonella larvae infected with CRKP, CAZ-AVI combined with carbapenem significantly improved the survival rate and inhibited the development of drug resistance compared with CAZ-AVI alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In a study of bloodstream infections caused by CRKP, 25 early initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy was associated with lower 30-day mortality. A study by Zheng et al 26 found that CAZ-AVI combined with in vitro insensitive drugs significantly reduced the 30-day mortality in CRKP-infected patients compared with CAZ-AVI alone, which is consistent with our findings. In a model of Galleria Mellonella larvae infected with CRKP, CAZ-AVI combined with carbapenem significantly improved the survival rate and inhibited the development of drug resistance compared with CAZ-AVI alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Studies are conducted in vitro and vivo to compare CAZ/AVI monotherapy with combination therapy. Zheng and his colleagues suggested that CAZ/AVI combined with another in vitro non-susceptible antimicrobials could significantly decrease the 30-day mortality rate of critically ill patients with CRKP infections compared with CAZ/AVI monotherapy (Zheng et al, 2021). An in vitro study indicated that polymyxin B and CAZ/AVI combinations could improve the antimicrobial activity, delay or suppress the regrowth of CRKP resistant subpopulation (Ma et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The worldwide outbreak of CRKP, especially in China, high mortality rate, and lack of effective therapies have brought new clinical practice challenges. Several retrospective observational studies showed that CAZ/AVIbased regimens had greater mortality benefits against CRE isolates, predominately KPC-producing Klebisella pneumonia, than best available regimens including tigecycline, aminoglycosides, and polymyxins (Shields et al, 2017a;van Duin et al, 2018;Tumbarello et al, 2019;Tsolaki et al, 2020;Zheng et al, 2021). Most studies with polymyxins have compared the clinical outcomes of colistinbased therapy with CAZ/AVI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, we found that using a combination treatment scheme of CAZ/AVI with carbapenems, fosfomycin, or tigecycline could significantly decrease the mortality of critically ill patients with CRKP infection [ 12 ]. However, PMB-based treatment regimen were not evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%