1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0011-393x(05)80723-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cefixime versus co-amoxiclav in the treatment of pediatric upper respiratory tract infections and otitis media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the overall incidence of protocol‐defined diarrhoea, determined from data recorded in diary booklets, was very low (bid 2.7%; tid 4.3%) and the difference in incidence between the two treatment groups was not statistically significant. These diarrhoea rates, which are lower than those previously reported for amoxycillin/clavulanate, 11–12 may be accounted for by the data‐collection methods used in this study, which were less subjective and more consistent than the reporting of diarrhoea as an adverse experience.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…In this study, the overall incidence of protocol‐defined diarrhoea, determined from data recorded in diary booklets, was very low (bid 2.7%; tid 4.3%) and the difference in incidence between the two treatment groups was not statistically significant. These diarrhoea rates, which are lower than those previously reported for amoxycillin/clavulanate, 11–12 may be accounted for by the data‐collection methods used in this study, which were less subjective and more consistent than the reporting of diarrhoea as an adverse experience.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%