1954
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1954.02940380017005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cecostomy and Colostomy in Acute Colon Obstructions

Abstract: The relative merits of cecostomy and colostomy as de-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1958
1958
1975
1975

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such problems include occlusion of the catheter by faeces, spillage of faeces into the abdominal cavity and postoperative recurrent caecal rupture. Tube caecostomy has failed in up to 50 per cent of cases and has been condemned by many (Gregg and Dixon, 1941 ;Hendricks and Griffin, 1947;Michel and McCafferty, 1948;Albers and Smith, 1952;Hunt, 1954;Rack and Clement, 1954;Maynard and Turell, 1955). Moreover, inadequate function of the tube can be fatal (Jackson and Baird, 1967;Hopkins, 1969;Balslev et al, 1970;Norton et al, 1974).…”
Section: Caecal Rupture Due To Colonic Lieusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such problems include occlusion of the catheter by faeces, spillage of faeces into the abdominal cavity and postoperative recurrent caecal rupture. Tube caecostomy has failed in up to 50 per cent of cases and has been condemned by many (Gregg and Dixon, 1941 ;Hendricks and Griffin, 1947;Michel and McCafferty, 1948;Albers and Smith, 1952;Hunt, 1954;Rack and Clement, 1954;Maynard and Turell, 1955). Moreover, inadequate function of the tube can be fatal (Jackson and Baird, 1967;Hopkins, 1969;Balslev et al, 1970;Norton et al, 1974).…”
Section: Caecal Rupture Due To Colonic Lieusmentioning
confidence: 99%