1995
DOI: 10.1016/0169-5002(95)00485-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CEA, CYFRA21-1 and SCC in non-small cell lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
83
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CA125 is used mainly for ovarian cancer screening and diagnosis (23,24), whereas CEA is used for the diagnosis and prognosis of several types of cancer, including colon cancer (25,26). Both CEA and CA125 were useful for monitoring recurrence and evaluating prognosis in NSCLCs but only performed moderately in diagnosing NSCLCs (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). We also included Cyfra21-1 because it is useful for the diagnosis of both SCCs and overall NSCLCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CA125 is used mainly for ovarian cancer screening and diagnosis (23,24), whereas CEA is used for the diagnosis and prognosis of several types of cancer, including colon cancer (25,26). Both CEA and CA125 were useful for monitoring recurrence and evaluating prognosis in NSCLCs but only performed moderately in diagnosing NSCLCs (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). We also included Cyfra21-1 because it is useful for the diagnosis of both SCCs and overall NSCLCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), a glycoprotein first described in 1965 by Gold and Freedman [1], is one of the most widely used tumor makers, and is used in the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer [2][3][4], colon cancer [5][6][7], lung cancer [8,9] and ovarian carcinoma [10]. CEA level in serum is also related to the state of the tumor, so it can be used as a marker to directly evaluate curative effects, recrudescence, and metastasis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By analysing the different prognostic studies (Ebert et al, 1993(Ebert et al, , 1997Pujol et al, 1993aPujol et al, , 1996Pujol et al, , 2001aGiovanella et al, 1995;Moro et al, 1995;Paesmans et al, 1995a;Wieskopf et al, 1995;Szturmowicz et al, 1996;Brechot et al, 1997;Hamzaoui et al, 1997;Takei et al, 1997;Hirashima et al, 1998;Niklinski et al, 1998;Nisman et al, 1998Nisman et al, , 1999Foa et al, 1999;Kashiwabara et al, 2000;Buccheri et al, 2003), one can observe that there are some uncertainties regarding the exact hazard ratio of risk of death associated with a high serum CYFRA 21-1 level insofar as the estimated values range from 1.05 (Moro et al, 1995) to 2.8 (Wieskopf et al, 1995). This discrepancy is puzzling and might reflect both the relatively small size of the studies and the inconstancy of co-variables introduced in the proportional hazards model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%