2012
DOI: 10.1021/ef301386f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ce–Mn Oxides for High-Temperature Gasifier Effluent Desulfurization

Abstract: We examined Ce–Mn mixed oxides as high-temperature desulfurization materials, exploring various Mn/Ce ratios and the effects of admixing other rare earth oxides. The sulfur capacities at temperatures from 900 to 1025 K with simple air regeneration were measured for repeat cycles until a stable, reversible capacity was obtained. The measured sulfur capacities with a realistic model syngas containing H2S, H2, N2, CO, H2O, and CO2 were compared to thermodynamically possible maximum sulfur capacities. The oxidized… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
63
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
9
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it was concluded that 750°C was the best for sulfidation [50]. [51], which is in agreement with the XRD results.…”
Section: Effect Of Reaction Temperature On the Desulphurization Perfosupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, it was concluded that 750°C was the best for sulfidation [50]. [51], which is in agreement with the XRD results.…”
Section: Effect Of Reaction Temperature On the Desulphurization Perfosupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Bakker et al [17] reported that supporting Mn onto c-Al 2 O 3 could increase the utilization of Mn and the desulphurization performance of Mn appeared to be stable during successive sulfidation/regeneration cycles, however, it was not easy to sulfidize fully as MnAl 2 O 4 formed at reductive atmosphere until 800°C. Besides, Li et al [18] found that the intimate combination of CeO 2 and MnO x could remarkably improve the sulfur capacity and desulphurization precision of sorbents as a result of the deformation of CeO 2 lattice, however, the utilization of c-Al 2 O 3 would reduce the sulfur capacity due to Mn ions dissolution into the c-Al 2 O 3 support. In addition, the specific surface areas and pore volumes of unsupported sorbents are quite small and they are easy to be sintering during preparation and sulfidation processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many metal oxides have been applied for high-temperature desulfurization, such as, ZnO [6,7], CuO [8,9], MnO x [10,11], and CeO 2 [12][13][14]. However, iron oxide is the most widely used sorbent for hot coal gas desulfurization in the field of the coal chemical industry owing to its good adsorption capacity, abundant resource, lower cost, and good physical strength [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single material capable of performing both cleanup steps at gasifier effluent temperatures would aid process integration [1,2]. MO x -CeO 2 materials can be used to adsorb sulfur [3][4][5][6][7][8] as well as reform hydrocarbons [8][9][10][11][12][13]. These two processes have mostly been studied independently from one another on oxides, though reforming in the presence of sulfur species has been examined on metal catalysts [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall mechanism to reform methane over a ceria surface is established [4,11,19]. The adsorption of sulfur using M-doped ceria has also been examined using both experimental and computational techniques [3][4][5][6][7]. Dooley and coworkers recently examined the impact of partial sulfidation of an oxide on reforming catalytic chemistry on ceria [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%