2010
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200900724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CE assay for simultaneous determination of charged and neutral impurities in dexamphetamine sulfate using a dual CD system

Abstract: A CE assay for the simultaneous determination of charged and uncharged potential impurities (1S,2S-(1)-norpseudoephedrine, 1R,2S-(À)-norephedrine, phenylacetone and phenylacetone oxime) of dexamphetamine sulfate including the stereoisomer levoamphetamine was developed and validated. The optimized background electrolyte consisted of a 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 3.0, containing 80 mg/mL sulfobutylether-b-CD and 25 mg/mL sulfated b-CD. Separations were performed in 40.2/35 cm, 50 mm id fused-silica capilla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(55 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of commercial samples of dexamphetamine sulfate by both methods revealed the presence of 3.2–3.8% levoamphetamine while all other impurities were either below the LOQ or could not be detected at all. Compared to the dual CD method , the MEEKC method showed higher LODs because of the increased baseline noise observed for MEEKC. However, all chemicals including sulfated β‐CD are rather inexpensive so that MEEKC may present a valuable alternative for the analysis of dexamphetamine.…”
Section: Separation and Analysis Of Small Molecules And Nonbiotechnolmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis of commercial samples of dexamphetamine sulfate by both methods revealed the presence of 3.2–3.8% levoamphetamine while all other impurities were either below the LOQ or could not be detected at all. Compared to the dual CD method , the MEEKC method showed higher LODs because of the increased baseline noise observed for MEEKC. However, all chemicals including sulfated β‐CD are rather inexpensive so that MEEKC may present a valuable alternative for the analysis of dexamphetamine.…”
Section: Separation and Analysis Of Small Molecules And Nonbiotechnolmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An example is the analysis of dexamphetamine with regard to the levorotatory enantiomer and other related substances including the charged impurities 1 R ,2 S ‐(−)‐norephedrine and 1 S ,2 S ‐(+)‐norpseudoephedrine as well as the uncharged compounds phenylacetone and phenylacetone oxime. In the first study, the separation was achieved using a dual CD system composed of the charged CD derivatives sulfobutylether‐β‐CD (SBE‐β‐CD) and sulfated β‐CD . The optimized BGE consisted of 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 3.0, containing 80 mg/mL SBE‐β‐CD and 25 mg/mL sulfated β‐CD.…”
Section: Separation and Analysis Of Small Molecules And Nonbiotechnolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first assay used HDAS-β-CD as chiral selector in a 50-mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 2.5 allowing the determination of levoamphetamine as well as the charged potential impurities 1S,2S-(+)-norpseudoephedrine and 1R,2S-(−)-norephedrine in commercial dexamphetamine samples [91]. The second method employed a dual CD system combining 25 mg/ml sulfated β-CD and 80 mg/ml SBE-β-CD in a 50-mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 2.5 and reversed polarity of the applied voltage [92]. This set-up also enabled the analysis of the neutral impurities phenylacetone and phenylacetone oxime besides the charged impurities.…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of CE in drug impurity analysis has been summarized [79,80]. Table 1 clearly reflects the general trend that CDs are by far the most widely used chiral selectors although some studies utilized other additives such as BSA [81], maltodextrin [82], (+)-18C6H4 [83], ligand exchange [84] or the chiral ionic liquid ethylcholine bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) Baclofen α-CD (18 mM) 0.1 M sodium borate, pH 9.9, 1% acetonitrile 2-10 μg/ml, analysis of racemic bulk drug and tablets [103] Benzimidazole derivatives Chloroquine SBE-β-CD (30 mg/ml) 100 mM sodium phosphate, pH 2.5 0.02%, analysis of laboratory sample [108] Clopidogrel Sulfated β-CD (5%) 10 mM triethylamine/phosphoric acid 0.08-0.33 μg/ml, minor enantiomer and related substances [109] Dexamphetamine HDAS-β-CD (10 mg/ml) 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 2.5 0.06%, minor enantiomer and charged related substances [91] Dexamphetamine Sulfated β-CD (25 mg/ml), SBE-β-CD (80 mg/ml) 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 2.5 0.01-0.02%, minor enantiomer and related substances [92] Dexamphetamine Sulfated β-CD (5.5%) 1.5% SDS, 0.5% ethyl acetate, 3.5% 1-butanol, 2.5% 2-propanol and 92% 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 3.0 0.05-0.2%, minor enantiomer and related substances [93] Econazole HP-γ-CD (40 mM) 50 mM SDS in 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 8.0…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With two different chiral selectors introduced simultaneously, chiral dual system often leads to a significant enhancement of selectivity and resolution (synergistic effect) due to differences in the complexation mechanisms of the two selectors with the analyte enantiomers . The use of dual CD systems has been reported in some studies, in which different combinations of charged and neutral CDs are employed .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%