2019
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2019.2904868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CDnet: CNN-Based Cloud Detection for Remote Sensing Imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dilated convolutions [39] can enlarge the receptive field using fewer layers while retaining feature density. This is a strategy used successfully on similar classification problems discriminating only clouds and cloud-shadows from clear-sky pixels [24,26]. However, early trials in this study with dilated convolutions produced unacceptable outputs with a structured speckle pattern when discriminating between water and shadows from both terrain and clouds; future work may be able to overcome this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dilated convolutions [39] can enlarge the receptive field using fewer layers while retaining feature density. This is a strategy used successfully on similar classification problems discriminating only clouds and cloud-shadows from clear-sky pixels [24,26]. However, early trials in this study with dilated convolutions produced unacceptable outputs with a structured speckle pattern when discriminating between water and shadows from both terrain and clouds; future work may be able to overcome this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Other deep learning networks have been tested against the Biome dataset and achieve overall accuracies of 94% [27], 95% (Li) [24], and 96.5% [26]. Each of these algorithms is focused on the clouds and cloud-shadow identification problem and do not produce classifications for water or snow/ice.…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fully convolutional neural networks (FCNN) [15], most of them based on the U-Net architecture [16], produce very accurate results and have the advantage that they can be applied to images of arbitrary size with a fast inference time. Works such as Jeppesen et al [17], Mohajerani and Sahedi [18], [19], Li et al [20], or Yang et al [21] tackle cloud detection in Landsat-8 using Fully Convolutional Neural Networks trained in publicly available manually annotated datasets. They all show very high cloud detection accuracy outperforming the operational Landsat-8 cloud detection algorithm, FMask [22].…”
Section: A Transfer Learning For Cloud Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current cloudy image, a mask map of clouds and cloud shadows, and a cloudless recent image of the same area were prepared in advance as the input. The mask map, which was a binary map where 1 represented the clean pixels (black), and 0 represents the clouds and cloud shadows (white), can be generated from recent CNN-based detection methods [43][44][45] or manual work. When an automatic algorithm was applied, the recall rate should be set high to detect most of the clouds; however, a relatively lower precision score will not affect the performance of the cloud removal task as a large number of clean pixels remain to train the cloud removal network.…”
Section: The Overall Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%