2023
DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CDK4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: Focus on toxicity and safety

Demi Wekking,
Matteo Lambertini,
Mariele Dessì
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exposure to chemicals: Chemicals like endocrine disruptors may disrupt hormonal balance, potentially contributing to breast cancer ( 105 ). evaluates CDK4/6 inhibitors’ toxicity in metastatic breast cancer, stressing personalized treatment strategies due to varying drug profiles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure to chemicals: Chemicals like endocrine disruptors may disrupt hormonal balance, potentially contributing to breast cancer ( 105 ). evaluates CDK4/6 inhibitors’ toxicity in metastatic breast cancer, stressing personalized treatment strategies due to varying drug profiles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a recent study of HR+, HER2− metastatic breast cancer patients receiving palbociclib-based therapy reported a similar prevalence of adverse effects to treatment and minimal differences in prevalence of specific adverse effects such as neutropenia, diarrhea, and fatigue between patients <70 and patients ≥70 over the course of the first six months of treatment [48]. Another study assessed the difference in prevalence of specific adverse effects associated with palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib and found neutropenia to be more prevalent in patients receiving palbociclib-based therapy and diarrhea to be more prevalent in patients receiving abemaciclib-based therapy [49]. Thus, nuances in the duration of treatment and the specific CDK4/6 inhibitor used may be responsible for discrepant findings regarding adverse effects and must be considered when assessing treatment-related toxicities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%