“…For example, C M V pneumonias can be differentiated according to their presentations and severity in four dif ferent patient populations: solid-organ trans plant recipients, bone marrow transplant re cipients, AID S patients, and immunocompe tent patients [8], Whereas mortality due to C M V pneumonitis ranges from 40 to 70% and 70 to 85% in solid-organ and bone mar row transplant recipients, respectively, mor tality is relatively low in A ID S patients and nonexistent in immunocompetent patients [8], It is therefore not surprising that AIDSrelated C M V retinitis would not respond to passively administered immunoglobulin even though antibody immunotherapy is effective against C M V disease in transplant recipients. Indeed, there is increasing evidence that cellu lar immunity rather than humoral immunity plays a prominent role in protecting against E ffect o f A n tibody on C M V R etinitis during M A ID S C M V retinitis, CD8+ cytotoxic T cells being particularly important [21]. Support for this notion has been provided by a study in which antibodies to CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell subsets were found to increase the susceptibility of BALB/c mice to M C M V retinitis following subrctinal M C M V inoculation [19], In addi tion, we have recently reported that interleu kin-2, a Th 1 cytokine that activates T cells and natural-killer cells, significantly reduced intraocular M C M V titers and frequency of M C M V necrotizing retinitis in mice with M A ID S when administered systemically 2 days prior to subretinal M C M V inoculation [22].…”