Sphingosine 1-phosphate subtype 1 (S1P 1 ) receptor agonists alter lymphocyte trafficking and endothelial barrier integrity in vivo. Among these is the potent, non-selective agonist, FTY720-P, whose mechanism of action has been suggested to correlate with S1P 1 down-regulation. Discovery of the in vivo active S1P 1 -selective agonist, SEW2871, has broadened our understanding of minimal requirements for S1P 1 function while highlighting differences regarding agonist effect on S1P 1 fate, because SEW2871 does not degrade S1P 1 . To further understand the mechanism of agonist-induced S1P 1 down-regulation, we compared signaling and fate of human S1P 1 -green fluorescent protein (GFP) in stable 293 cells, using AFD-R, a chiral analog of FTY720-P, SEW2871, and S1P. Although all agonists acutely internalized S1P 1 to late endosomal vesicles and activated GTP␥S 35 binding and pERK to similar maxima, only AFD-R led to significant S1P 1 down-regulation, as shown by GFP immunoprecipitation studies. Down-regulation was time-and concentration-dependent, was partially blocked by proteasomal inhibition and reversed by chloroquine and an antagonist to S1P 1 . All agonists induced a receptor-associated increase in ubiquitination, with AFD-R inducing 3-fold more accumulation than S1P and being 3-4 logs more potent than SEW2871. The formation of AFD-R-receptor ubiquitin complex was inhibited by antagonist and chloroquine and was enhanced by proteasomal inhibition. Identification of proteins by PAGE liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in cells treated with AFD-R confirmed the co-migration of ubiquitin peptides with those of S1P 1 and GFP, relative to vehicle alone. These data suggest that the hierarchy of ubiquitin recruitment to S1P 1 (AFD-R > S1P > SEW2871) correlates with the efficiency of lysosomal receptor degradation and reflects intrinsic differences between agonists.Trafficking of agonist-stimulated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) 2 classically proceeds through time-dependent steps starting by acute (within minutes) internalization of receptors from plasma membrane into cytoplasmic vesicular compartments and followed by receptor sorting into either recycling or degradative pathways, which usually take place within hours of agonist treatment. The long term effects of agonists on GPCR fate are dependent on both the nature of the agonist as well as the cellular environment and are believed to be important determinants of agonist effectiveness. Several mechanisms implicated in early GPCR trafficking have been described and involve phosphorylation of agonist-stimulated receptor by GPCR kinases and subsequent binding of arrestin proteins to phosphorylated receptor sites and to adapter proteins such as clathrin and AP-2, which form coated-pit receptor complexes (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). Based on the stability of the arrestin-receptor complexes, GPCRs have been separated into class A receptors, which favor the recycling pathway, and class B receptors, which recycle slowly and are instead destined for degradation ...