1997
DOI: 10.1093/emboj/16.12.3435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CD66 carcinoembryonic antigens mediate interactions between Opa-expressing Neisseria gonorrhoeae and human polymorphonuclear phagocytes

Abstract: Colonization of urogenital tissues by the human pathogen Neisseria gonorrhoeae is characteristically associated with purulent exudates of polymorphonuclear phagocytes (PMNs) containing apparently viable bacteria. Distinct variant forms of the phase‐variable opacity‐associated (Opa) outer membrane proteins mediate the non‐opsonized binding and internalization of N.gonorrhoeae by human PMNs. Using overlay assays and an affinity isolation technique, we demonstrate the direct interaction between Opa52‐expressing g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
248
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
248
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Opa 50 -expressing gonococci showed preference for Lec11 CEACAM1 cells and none of the other cell lines. Although Opa 50 interacts specifically with HSPG receptors (18,60), it does display a low level of CEACAM1 binding (20). Since Opa 50 binds the carbohydrate component of HSPGs, the difference in binding could plausibly be attributed to distinct CEACAM1 glycosylation patterns between the Lec11 cell lines and those previously used; however, detailed analysis of CEACAM glycosylation in these cells versus other cells has not been performed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Opa 50 -expressing gonococci showed preference for Lec11 CEACAM1 cells and none of the other cell lines. Although Opa 50 interacts specifically with HSPG receptors (18,60), it does display a low level of CEACAM1 binding (20). Since Opa 50 binds the carbohydrate component of HSPGs, the difference in binding could plausibly be attributed to distinct CEACAM1 glycosylation patterns between the Lec11 cell lines and those previously used; however, detailed analysis of CEACAM glycosylation in these cells versus other cells has not been performed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Postinfection, samples were washed with Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS) and fixed using 3.7% paraformaldehyde. The cells were stained for CEACAM and bacteria and observed as described previously (18). Intracellular bacteria were differentiated from extracellular bacteria via exclusion of N. gonorrhoeae-specific antibody, as described previously (41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stably transfected HeLa cell lines expressing the CEACAM1 (CD66a; BGP), CEACAM3 (CD66d; CGM1), CEACAM5 (CD66e; CEA), CEACAM6 (CD66c; NCA) and CEACAM8 (CD66b; CGM6) receptors (Berling et al, 1990;Nagel et al, 1993;Gray-Owen et al, 1997a) as well as the stably transfected CHO-CEACAM4 (CGM7) and CHO-CEACAM1 Oikawa et al, 1991) have been described previously. The CHO-CEA-CAM7 (CGM2) cell line (Schoelzel, S et al, data to be published) was a kind gift from Dr J. Thompson (Institut fu È r Immunbiologie, University of Freiburg, Germany).…”
Section: Cell Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infection of transiently transfected cells was performed as for the stable cell lines, except that cells were initially seeded onto 12 mm glass coverslips and ®xed after the ®nal washing step of the infection experiment by incubation in 3.7% paraformaldehyde in 200 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) for 30 min. Fixed samples were then immunocytochemically stained, and binding interactions were analysed by confocal laser scanning microscopy as described previously (Gray-Owen et al, 1997a).…”
Section: Bacterial Infection Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%