2000
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CD52 antibodies for prevention of graft-versus-host disease and graft rejection following transplantation of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells

Abstract: Summary:Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, but can be avoided by removing T lymphocytes from the donor bone marrow. However, T cell depletion increases the risk of graft rejection. In this study, two strategies are used to overcome rejection: (1) use of high doses of stem cells obtained from peripheral blood (PBSC), (2) admixture with a CD52 monoclonal antibody in order to deplete both donor and residual recipient lymphocyt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
80
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…12,20,21 However, these regimens necessitated the use of subsequent DLI to establish full donor chimerism with the increased risk of subsequent GVHD. [38][39][40]44 The high response rate and OS in this high-risk population demonstrates that this RIT regimen was effective for disease control, even in patients with active disease at the time of the transplant. Surprisingly, neither age nor donor type (sibling or unrelated donor) had an impact on the incidence or severity of aGVHD or survival.…”
Section: Survival and Disease Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12,20,21 However, these regimens necessitated the use of subsequent DLI to establish full donor chimerism with the increased risk of subsequent GVHD. [38][39][40]44 The high response rate and OS in this high-risk population demonstrates that this RIT regimen was effective for disease control, even in patients with active disease at the time of the transplant. Surprisingly, neither age nor donor type (sibling or unrelated donor) had an impact on the incidence or severity of aGVHD or survival.…”
Section: Survival and Disease Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,40,43 However, in contrast to the T-cellmodified transplants, we did not observe a high incidence of infectious complications, mixed chimerism, or disease relapse. 21,40,43,44 Moreover, the patients in our study were at high risk for the development of aGVHD: 31% received either an unrelated donor or mismatched related donor transplant, 43% were recipients of a sex-mismatched transplant, 44% were over the age of 50 years, and 66% were heavily pretreated or had refractory disease (Table 2). 41 It is unclear as to which components of our preparative regimen contributed to the low incidence of aGVHD.…”
Section: Survival and Disease Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,17,18 The in vivo administration of alemtuzumab results in profound immunosuppression, significantly reducing GVHD when compared with T-cell replete transplants for a variety of haematological malignancies. 12,13,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Conversely, as a result of the depletion of the lymphocytes and APCs involved in GVL as well as GVHD, alemtuzumab has been associated with increased risk of relapse 26 In addition, alemtuzumab is associated with poor immune recovery post transplant, 26 and it is now apparent that an increased risk of infections after transplant with alemtuzumab is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. 27,28 Balancing these competing effects in favour of low non-relapse mortality is the goal of the effective use of alemtuzumab.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the monoclonal anti-CD52 antibody alemtuzumab has also been rather extensively explored to reduce the incidence of GvHD, either by the so-called treatment "in the bag" or by systemic intravenous infusion before the conditioning. 57 Alemtuzumab reduced GvHD, but at the same time its use remarkably affected response rates and response duration. These findings further confirm the pivotal role of donor T cells in providing graft-versus-myeloma activity.…”
Section: Gvhd and T-cell Depletionmentioning
confidence: 99%