2019
DOI: 10.2217/bmm-2018-0337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cd44 Epithelial Isoform Inversely Associates with Invasive Characteristics of Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: There is no consensus regarding the clinical significance of CD44 and CD24 as cancer stem cell (CSC) marker in colorectal cancer (CRC). Methodology: A total of 494 CRC samples (2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017) were assessed for CD44 (epithelial isoform) and CD24 expression using tissue microarray. Results: CD24 individually or in combination with CD44 was not associated with any of the clinicopathologic characteristics of the tumor. CD44 expression was inversely associated with patho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Slides were first scanned at low magnification (10x magnification), and 10 high magnification fields (400x magnification) were assessed. For scoring gene and miRNA expression, the intensity of staining was classified into 0 (no expression), 1 (weak expression), 2 (moderate expression) and 3 (high expression), and the percentage of positive cells was categorized as 1 (positive cells ≤25%), 2 (25% < positive cells ≤50%), 3 (50% < positive cells ≤75%) and 4 (positive tumor cells > 75%) [ 18 , 19 ]. The histochemical score (H-score) was achieved by multiplying the staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells and ranged from 0 to 300.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Slides were first scanned at low magnification (10x magnification), and 10 high magnification fields (400x magnification) were assessed. For scoring gene and miRNA expression, the intensity of staining was classified into 0 (no expression), 1 (weak expression), 2 (moderate expression) and 3 (high expression), and the percentage of positive cells was categorized as 1 (positive cells ≤25%), 2 (25% < positive cells ≤50%), 3 (50% < positive cells ≤75%) and 4 (positive tumor cells > 75%) [ 18 , 19 ]. The histochemical score (H-score) was achieved by multiplying the staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells and ranged from 0 to 300.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The histochemical score (H-score) was achieved by multiplying the staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells and ranged from 0 to 300. The mean of H-score was considered the cut-off point [ 18 ]. Any cell with CD8-positive staining was counted as CD8 + T-TIL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slides were rst scanned at low magni cation (10x magni cation) and 10 high magni cation elds (400x magni cation) were assessed. For scoring gene expression, intensity of staining was classi ed into 0 (no expression), 1 (weak expression), 2 (moderate expression) and 3 (high expression); and the percentage of positive cells was categorized as 1 (positive cells ≤25%), 2 (25%< positive cells ≤50%), 3 (50% < positive cells ≤75%) and 4 (positive tumor cells >75%) (13). The histochemical score (H-score) was achieved by multiplying the staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells and ranged from 0 to 300.…”
Section: Western Blottingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The histochemical score (H-score) was achieved by multiplying the staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells and ranged from 0 to 300. The mean of H-score was considered as the cut-off point (13). Any cell with CD8-positive staining was counted as CD8 + T-TIL.…”
Section: Western Blottingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slides were rst scanned at low magni cation (10x magni cation), and 10 high magni cation elds (400x magni cation) were assessed. For scoring gene and miRNA expression, the intensity of staining was classi ed into 0 (no expression), 1 (weak expression), 2 (moderate expression) and 3 (high expression), and the percentage of positive cells was categorized as 1 (positive cells ≤25%), 2 (25%< positive cells ≤50%), 3 (50% < positive cells ≤75%) and 4 (positive tumor cells >75%) (18,19). The histochemical score (H-score) was achieved by multiplying the staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells and ranged from 0 to 300.…”
Section: Ihc and Ishmentioning
confidence: 99%