2017
DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CD4 Count in HIV− Brain-Dead Donors

Abstract: Absolute numbers of CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes are commonly reduced after brain death in HIV- individuals. Thus, CD4 absolute numbers are an inconsistent metric for assessing organ donor risk, irrespective of HIV status.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 In addition, a recent study of 20 conventional brain death donors found that 55% of these HIVuninfected donors had a CD4 <200. 23 This indicates that in the setting of brain death, the CD4 count may not be a reliable metric for infectious risk. In the study by Richterman et However, this study represents the largest report of HIV D+ referrals to date in the USA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…19 In addition, a recent study of 20 conventional brain death donors found that 55% of these HIVuninfected donors had a CD4 <200. 23 This indicates that in the setting of brain death, the CD4 count may not be a reliable metric for infectious risk. In the study by Richterman et However, this study represents the largest report of HIV D+ referrals to date in the USA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to HOPE Act implementation, candidates' HIV status was not collected at the time of wait‐listing. To estimate the potential pool of HIV+ transplant candidates, a recent study used pharmacy claims and data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to identify 727 HIV+ kidney transplant candidates between 2009 and 2012 . This was only a subset of HIV+ individuals who could benefit from transplantation, underscoring the substantial need for organs and the potential public health impact of HIV D+ organs for HIV+ individuals with end‐stage kidney disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Donor characteristics are shown in Table 1. Comparing HIVpositive and FP donors, the median age (IQR) was 36 (29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46) versus 31 (23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41) years, respectively (P = .01); 76% versus 65% were male (P = .25); and 37% versus 44% were white (P = .21). The median body mass index (IQR) (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) was 25.2 (22.7-29) in HIV-positive and 28.4 (22.1-34.8) in FP donors (P = .11).…”
Section: Donor Characteristics: Hiv Positive Versus Fpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This guideline is supported by the fact that there were no CD4 exclusions applied to HIV+ donors in South Africa [10]. In addition, a recent study demonstrated that in the setting of brain death a donor’s CD4 count may not be a reliable metric of infectious risk to the recipient [41]. The federal criteria are fairly minimal: 1) donors cannot have evidence of an active opportunistic infection, 2) any CD4 count or HIV plasma RNA level is allowed, as long as a study team can describe an effective post-transplant antiretroviral regimen in the recipient.…”
Section: Progress Toward Implementation: Organ Procurement Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%