2017
DOI: 10.1160/th17-03-0201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CD32 inhibition and high dose of rhFVIII suppress murine FVIII-specific recall response by distinct mechanisms in vitro

Abstract: Development of neutralising antibodies (inhibitors) against factor VIII (FVIII) is a frequent and severe complication of replacement therapy in haemophilia A. Previous data from haemophilia A mouse model demonstrates that both CD32 inhibition and high doses of rhFVIII prevent the differentiation of FVIII-specific memory B cells (MBCs) into antibody secreting cells (ASCs). Here, cellular targets responsible for the suppression of ASC formation by means of CD32 inhibition and high dose of rhFVIII were analysed. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formation of FVIII‐specific ASCs was suppressed by AT128 in a dose‐dependent manner, and T cell stimulation was diminished at higher doses (Figure A). In comparison with the dual anti‐CD16/CD32 mAb, a five times higher concentration of AT128 was needed to suppress the FVIII‐specific recall response, probably reflecting its lower affinity for CD32 . Otherwise, results observed with this mAb were similar to those with anti‐CD16/CD32 mAb excluding major effects occurring from the additional blockade of CD16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Formation of FVIII‐specific ASCs was suppressed by AT128 in a dose‐dependent manner, and T cell stimulation was diminished at higher doses (Figure A). In comparison with the dual anti‐CD16/CD32 mAb, a five times higher concentration of AT128 was needed to suppress the FVIII‐specific recall response, probably reflecting its lower affinity for CD32 . Otherwise, results observed with this mAb were similar to those with anti‐CD16/CD32 mAb excluding major effects occurring from the additional blockade of CD16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Genetic deletion or inhibition of CD32 suppressed the FVIII‐specific recall response by inducing apoptosis in FVIII‐specific MBCs and reducing T cell stimulation by APCs . The receptor mechanisms preventing the FVIII‐specific recall response, however, remained unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations