2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CD3−CD4+ Lymphocytic Variant Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: Diagnostic Tools Revisited

Abstract: BackgroundIdentification of patients with lymphocytic variant hypereosinophilic syndrome (L-HES) is challenging, and has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. ObjectiveThis study was undertaken to assess diagnostic tools for L-HES and to develop evidence-based diagnostic recommendations. MethodsBiomarkers of T cell driven disease were compared between patients with L-HES versus idiopathic HES (I-HES) variants. Those performed routinely (serum immunoglobulin levels, T cell phenotyping, TCR gene rea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypereosinophilic syndrome In patients presenting with persistent unexplained HE, markedly elevated sTARC/CCL17 levels are associated with L-HES whereas normal values are observed in patients with no evidence for underlying Th2driven pathogenesis [136]. In a recent study on a large cohort of HES patients, our group determined that a threshold value of 3000 pg/ml should raise suspicion of L-HES [143] although similarly elevated levels were also observed in patients with I-HES presenting clinically as eosinophilic dermatitis. A rise in sTARC/CCL17 could also be an early marker heralding a disease flare in patients with episodic angioedema with eosinophilia associated with CD3 -CD4 + T cells [95].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Hypereosinophilic syndrome In patients presenting with persistent unexplained HE, markedly elevated sTARC/CCL17 levels are associated with L-HES whereas normal values are observed in patients with no evidence for underlying Th2driven pathogenesis [136]. In a recent study on a large cohort of HES patients, our group determined that a threshold value of 3000 pg/ml should raise suspicion of L-HES [143] although similarly elevated levels were also observed in patients with I-HES presenting clinically as eosinophilic dermatitis. A rise in sTARC/CCL17 could also be an early marker heralding a disease flare in patients with episodic angioedema with eosinophilia associated with CD3 -CD4 + T cells [95].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Furthermore, the definitions of L-HES have varied over time as the World Health Organization (WHO) classifications of haematological malignancies and eosinophilia have changed, and patients with L-HES included in earlier studies may not align with those included in more recent studies. 2,7 Studies variably defined patients as having L-HES based on flow cytometry, PCR analysis of the TCR, or both. Future studies should use rigorous definitions for L-HES, with the degree of certainty in the diagnosis and inclusion of diagnostic considerations in difficult cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, there are no universally accepted criteria for diagnosis of L‐HES and small reactive populations of aberrant T cells may be seen in other conditions, so patients should be carefully evaluated for mimickers of L‐HES, e.g. eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), immunoglobulin G4‐related disease (IgG4‐RD) and autoimmune disease 5–7 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CD3 - CD4 + is a heterogeneous group. CD4 has been reported to express in T cells (CD3 − CD4 + T cells) [ 39 ], B cells [ 40 ], NKs [ 41 ], DCs [ 42 ], macrophages [ 43 ], monocytes [ 44 ], eosinophils [ 45 ], etc. Among these cells, CD4+ NKs, DCs, macrophages and monocytes have been reported to express TNF-α [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%