2007
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.01072-06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CD3 and Immunoglobulin G Fc Receptor Regulate Cerebellar Functions

Abstract: The immune and nervous systems display considerable overlap in their molecular repertoire. Molecules originally shown to be critical for immune responses also serve neuronal functions that include normal brain development, neuronal differentiation, synaptic plasticity, and behavior. We show here that Fc␥RIIB, a low-affinity immunoglobulin G Fc receptor, and CD3 are involved in cerebellar functions. Although membranous CD3 and Fc␥RIIB are crucial regulators on different cells in the immune system, both CD3 and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cerebral expression of the four CD3 subunits raised the possibility that a kind of CD3 complex may exist in the brain similarly as in the immune system. However, CD3 mRNA was not detected in the cerebellum (Nakamura et al, 2007), and we were not able to detect CD3 at the protein level in forebrain samples (data not shown). Thus CD3 appeared to be expressed in distinct brain regions different from those for CD3, -␥, and -␦, suggesting that CD3 may function independently from the other CD3 subunits, as reported in NK cells (Lanier, 2001).…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms For Cd3 Neuronal Functionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cerebral expression of the four CD3 subunits raised the possibility that a kind of CD3 complex may exist in the brain similarly as in the immune system. However, CD3 mRNA was not detected in the cerebellum (Nakamura et al, 2007), and we were not able to detect CD3 at the protein level in forebrain samples (data not shown). Thus CD3 appeared to be expressed in distinct brain regions different from those for CD3, -␥, and -␦, suggesting that CD3 may function independently from the other CD3 subunits, as reported in NK cells (Lanier, 2001).…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms For Cd3 Neuronal Functionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The CD3, -␥ and -␦ have all been detected in the cerebellum and CD3-deficient mice, in which CD3-␥ and CD3-␦ protein levels are also reduced, showed an impaired neuronal architecture of Purkinje neurons (Nakamura et al, 2007). The cerebral expression of the four CD3 subunits raised the possibility that a kind of CD3 complex may exist in the brain similarly as in the immune system.…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms For Cd3 Neuronal Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although obligate components of the TCR complex are non-functional or missing in the brain (55), TCR co-receptors, including CD3ζ and CD3ε, are present in the rodent and feline CNS (5658). It remains unknown whether or how MHCI interacts with these co-receptors.…”
Section: Mhci In the Cnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary antibodies used were goat anti-Brn1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), anti-Brn2 (Santa Cruz), and anti-BLBP (Santa Cruz), mouse antireelin (Santa Cruz), goat antinestin (Santa Cruz), goat anti-GFAP (Santa Cruz), mouse anti-PSD95 (BD Biosciences), mouse antibromodeoxyuridine (anti-BrdU) (BD Biosciences), rat anti-BrdU (Serotec, Oxford, United Kingdom), mouse anti-␤-catenin (BD Biosciences), rabbit anti-␤-catenin (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), mouse anti-Pax6 (Abcam), guinea pig antidoublecortin (anti-DCX) (Millipore), mouse anti-␤III tubulin (Millipore), rabbit anti-␤III tubulin (TUJ1) (Covance, Princeton, NJ), mouse anti-Pin1 (35), rabbit anti-Pin1 (35), rat anti-CTIP2 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), and rabbit anti-Tbr2 (14) (kindly provided by Robert F. Hevner) antibodies. Immunofluorescence staining and immunohistochemistry of the mouse brain and cultured cells were done essentially as described previously (35,56,57,59), and samples were visualized with a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM510). The intensities of BrdU-, DCX-, Pax6-, Tbr2-, Brn1-, and Brn2-positive signals were counted within the same area for WT and Pin1 KO mice, with WT control levels being defined as 100% (n ϭ 2 to 7 per group).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%