2018
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.121157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CD226 opposes TIGIT to disrupt Tregs in melanoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
138
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
138
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent studies have revealed previously unappreciated intrinsic roles of TIGIT in Treg cells. Despite previous observations that TIGIT expression marks a highly suppressive population of Treg cells, the exact underlying mechanisms and the potential roles of intrinsic TIGIT‐signaling in Treg cells have not been fully elucidated. Whereas effector T cells up‐regulate both CD226 and TIGIT upon activation, Treg cells preferentially up‐regulate TIGIT over CD226 .…”
Section: Inhibitory Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, recent studies have revealed previously unappreciated intrinsic roles of TIGIT in Treg cells. Despite previous observations that TIGIT expression marks a highly suppressive population of Treg cells, the exact underlying mechanisms and the potential roles of intrinsic TIGIT‐signaling in Treg cells have not been fully elucidated. Whereas effector T cells up‐regulate both CD226 and TIGIT upon activation, Treg cells preferentially up‐regulate TIGIT over CD226 .…”
Section: Inhibitory Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Despite previous observations that TIGIT expression marks a highly suppressive population of Treg cells, the exact underlying mechanisms and the potential roles of intrinsic TIGIT‐signaling in Treg cells have not been fully elucidated. Whereas effector T cells up‐regulate both CD226 and TIGIT upon activation, Treg cells preferentially up‐regulate TIGIT over CD226 . CD226‐signaling detrimentally impacts Treg cell stability and function, and TIGIT–PVR interaction was required to maintain the suppressive function of Treg cells .…”
Section: Inhibitory Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, TIGIT competes for its ligands CD112 and CD155 with the costimulatory receptor CD226 which, unlike conventional T cells, is associated with functionally suppressed Treg cells. 132 This study suggests that the CD226/TIGIT ratio correlates with Treg cell stability, and clinical outcome in individuals with melanoma. Moreover, both CD112 and CD155 over-expression is reported in cancer, 133 although further work is required to delineate the interaction dynamics with the multiple TIGIT-expressing cell-types.…”
Section: Co-inhibitory Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Interestingly, TIGIT + Treg cells preferentially suppress Th1 and Th17 (but not Th2) cells, the former being important in anti‐tumour immunity. Moreover, TIGIT competes for its ligands CD112 and CD155 with the co‐stimulatory receptor CD226 which, unlike conventional T cells, is associated with functionally suppressed Treg cells . This study suggests that the CD226/TIGIT ratio correlates with Treg cell stability, and clinical outcome in individuals with melanoma.…”
Section: Regulation Of Treg Cells In Cancermentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Elucidating the factors influencing Treg function is important for understanding the disease pathogenesis and further identifying therapeutic opportunities. In recent studies, Tregs were observed to exhibit increased TIGIT expression and decreased CD226 expression compared to CD4 + effector T cells, resulting in an increased TIGIT/CD226 ratio in the periphery and at the tumor sites of melanoma patients . Thus, CD226 and TIGIT exert opposing effects in Tregs upon CD155 binding .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%