2001
DOI: 10.1117/12.436847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CD changes of 193-nm resists during SEM measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is these reactions that are of most importance to the metrologist since this is the timeframe during which inline metrology will take place. Kudo, et al 4 discuss these reactions for the well-studied case of poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) resist. For PMMA, continuous e-beam exposure results in chemical changes to the polymer that make it impervious to further mass loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is these reactions that are of most importance to the metrologist since this is the timeframe during which inline metrology will take place. Kudo, et al 4 discuss these reactions for the well-studied case of poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) resist. For PMMA, continuous e-beam exposure results in chemical changes to the polymer that make it impervious to further mass loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The 248 nm resist line slimming behavior has become the benchmark by which the 193 nm resist systems are gauged. 3,4 State-of-the-art 193 nm resists exhibit significant line slimming relative to this benchmark. Several factors further exacerbate the impact of resist line slimming in the sub-100 nm regime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The slimming process can be fitted well with a triple exponential rate law, indicating three different processes contributing to the CD slimming [10].…”
Section: Influence Of A-beam Curing On the CD Slimming Of 193nm Resistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously reported that the methacrylate resists exhibited faster line width reduction than the cycloolefin-maleic anhydride (COMA) systems, and proposed several possible slimming mechanisms of the 193 nm resists [5,6]. However, more detailed studies revealed that the polymer structure was not the only decisive factor for LWS, and the resist components as well as CD SEM settings were found to play an important role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Su et al [3] proposed a shrinkage model assuming LWS could be caused by crosslinking or other chemical reactions; however, in this study the causes for resist shrinkage were still considered to be uncertain. It was also reported that LWS was moderated by reducing acceleration voltage or flux density of e-beam during the CD SEM measurement [1][2][3][4][5]. So far, the improvement of CD degradation has been mainly studied by equipment or process changes but little research has been reported for resist materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%