Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2023
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.tps6114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CCTG HN11: SPECT-CT guided elective contralateral neck treatment (SELECT) for patients with lateralized oropharyngeal cancer—A phase III randomized controlled trial.

Abstract: TPS6114 Background: Lymphatic mapping identifies neck lymph nodes at risk for cancer spread in patients with lateralized oropharyngeal (OPC) squamous cell carcinoma. We hypothesize that a lymphatic mapping guided approach to radiotherapy (RT) treatment of the contralateral neck will enable safe de-escalation of therapy with acceptable disease control with potential benefits in RT related toxicity, QOL, swallowing function and economics. Methods: HN.11 is a Canadian Cancer Trials Group international multi-cent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, our data suggest that efforts to reduce carotid dose (e.g. unilateral radiotherapy,(27, 28), margin reduction,(29) or conformal techniques,(30, 31) are justifiable based on secondary imaging showing sub-acute vascular injury, and should be consistently considered when feasible if they do not compromise tumor control or oncologic recurrence risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Additionally, our data suggest that efforts to reduce carotid dose (e.g. unilateral radiotherapy,(27, 28), margin reduction,(29) or conformal techniques,(30, 31) are justifiable based on secondary imaging showing sub-acute vascular injury, and should be consistently considered when feasible if they do not compromise tumor control or oncologic recurrence risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%