2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CCS scenarios optimization by spatial multi-criteria analysis: Application to multiple source sink matching in Hebei province

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morbee established the mathematical model of InfraCCS, achieving single-stage and multi-stage programming respectively [22]. Chen developed ChinaCCUS with several different sources and sinks matching models [23][24][25][26]. Most of these mathematical models are mixed integer programming (MIP) for fixed number of nodes but with difference on assumptions and practical constraints.…”
Section: Ccus Ssm Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Morbee established the mathematical model of InfraCCS, achieving single-stage and multi-stage programming respectively [22]. Chen developed ChinaCCUS with several different sources and sinks matching models [23][24][25][26]. Most of these mathematical models are mixed integer programming (MIP) for fixed number of nodes but with difference on assumptions and practical constraints.…”
Section: Ccus Ssm Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ChinaCCUS DSS is developed for matching carbon sources and sinks based on ArcGIS and GAMS [23][24][25][26]. The Unified Modeling Language (UML) sequence diagrams are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Chinaccus Dssmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, a number of studies (Benson et al, 2003;Brunsvold et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2009Chen et al, , 2010Kazmierczak et al, 2009;Middleton and Bielicki, 2009;Morbee et al, 2011) examine how to obtain the optimal CCS transport network by minimising the present value (PV) of the total capital and operating cost of transport. This approach does not consider any extra CO 2 emissions related to operating the transport network and, therefore, does not necessarily yield the lowest CCS network cost per tonne of CO 2 avoided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acknowledging the fact that fossil fuels are likely to remain play a key role for the coming decades, carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) as a technological option is becoming ever more relevant. Especially for countries with rapidly increasing energy demand and a huge amount of coal resources like China, the CCS option as a strategic climate mitigation technology is much more evident (IEA, 2008b;Liu and Gallagher, 2009;Chen et al, 2010). An integrated CCS system involves three main phases: the first phase is the capture portion whereby CO 2 is captured and compressed at a large stationary source, such as a coal-fired power plant or a steel works; the second phase includes the transportation of the captured CO 2 via a dedicated pipeline infrastructure to the injection site where the CO 2 will be stored; in the third phase, storage of the CO 2 occurs when it is injected into a suitable geological formation for long-term isolation from the atmosphere (IPCC, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%