2013
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jit575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CCR5 Expression Is Reduced in Lymph Nodes of HIV Type 1-Infected Women, Compared With Men, But Does Not Mediate Sex-Based Differences in Viral Loads

Abstract: Reduced lymph node CCR5 expression in women did not account for the viral load difference between sexes. CCR5 expression did not predict viral load or frequencies of HIV-1 RNA-producing cells, indicating that physiologic levels of CCR5 do not limit HIV-1 replication in lymph node. Less plasma virus was associated with each HIV-1 RNA-producing cell in women as compared to men, suggesting that women may either produce fewer virions per productively infected cell or more effectively clear extracellular virus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(70 reference statements)
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9 In all instances in which virus tropism has been determined in these subjects they were infected with R5 tropic virus. 8 It is unknown whether a similar follicular concentration of virus exists in X4 infections. Intriguingly, studies of SIV-infected rhesus macaques acutely coinfected with R5 and X4 viruses demonstrated that the preference for R5 replication does not exist during acute infection, but only emerges several weeks after infection coincident with the development of virusspecific cytotoxic T cells (CTL), 49 providing support for the hypothesis that it is the adaptive immune response that favors R5 infection over X4 infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 In all instances in which virus tropism has been determined in these subjects they were infected with R5 tropic virus. 8 It is unknown whether a similar follicular concentration of virus exists in X4 infections. Intriguingly, studies of SIV-infected rhesus macaques acutely coinfected with R5 and X4 viruses demonstrated that the preference for R5 replication does not exist during acute infection, but only emerges several weeks after infection coincident with the development of virusspecific cytotoxic T cells (CTL), 49 providing support for the hypothesis that it is the adaptive immune response that favors R5 infection over X4 infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] While the majority of CD4 + T cells are found within the T cell zones (extrafollicular areas) of lymphoid tissues, most HIV-1-producing cells are CD4 + T cells located within B cell follicles in early and intermediate stages of HIV disease. [5][6][7][8][9] In untreated HIV-1-infected individuals without AIDS, follicular CD4 + cells are 40 times more likely to be productively infected than extrafollicular CD4 + cells. 9 Mechanisms underlying the concentration of HIV-1 replication in follicular CD4 + T cells are not well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…found that women have reduced lymph node CCR5 expression, but this could not account for the lower viral load. Instead, lower viral load in plasma was associated with each HIV‐1 RNA‐producing cell, suggesting that women may either produce fewer virions per productively infected cell, or more effectively clear extracellular virus . Because HIV‐2 is more promiscuous in its coreceptor usage, using coreceptors other than CCR5 , one may expect the biggest sex difference to be seen in HIV‐1‐mono‐infected patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD4 T-cell counts ranged from 300 to 1,117 cells per mm 3 (median, 542.5 cells per mm 3 ), and plasma viral load ranged from 3.84 to 5.24 log 10 copies per ml (median, 4.53 log 10 copies per ml). Virus tropism was evaluated in all six subjects as previously described (45). In five subjects virus was determined to be R5 tropic, and in the sixth subject tropism could not be determined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%