2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfs.2015.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CCPs and network stability in OTC derivatives markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Paddrik et al (2016) and Paddrik and Young (2017) make different assumptions about the contagion mechanism, which focus on solvency risks. Heath et al (2016) also study the network of net exposures from OTC derivatives. On the contrary, we focus solely on the short-term dynamics of liquidity shocks across different OTC derivative markets in the form of reduced payments, rather than focusing on potential solvency problems that might subsequently ensue.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Paddrik et al (2016) and Paddrik and Young (2017) make different assumptions about the contagion mechanism, which focus on solvency risks. Heath et al (2016) also study the network of net exposures from OTC derivatives. On the contrary, we focus solely on the short-term dynamics of liquidity shocks across different OTC derivative markets in the form of reduced payments, rather than focusing on potential solvency problems that might subsequently ensue.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, they allow institutions to meet their obligations by also using the initial margins they have collected, which should normally be usable only after the default of the institutions that posted them. Furthermore, we extend the contagion mechanism used in Heath et al (2016) by accounting for incoming VM payments and by allowing partial payments by institutions in stress. Heath et al (2016) also study the network of net exposures from OTC derivatives.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations