2022
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01890-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CCLOWW: A grade-level Chinese children’s lexicon of written words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morrison et al reported that there was a strong correlation (r = .75) between young adult AoA ratings and measures of objective AoA that were recorded from object naming in children. This is not limited to only British and American culture, and has been replicated and generalized (r = .50-.96) in several languages: Chinese, French, Icelandic, Italian, Kannada, Spanish, and Turkish (Álvarez & Cuetos, 2007;Bangalore et al, 2022;Chalard et al, 2003;Chedid et al, 2019;Göz et al, 2017;Li et al, 2022;Liu et al, 2011;Lotto et al, 2010;Montefinese et al, 2019;Perez & Navalon, 2005;Pind et al, 2000;Pind & Tryggvadóttir, 2002). Recently, these AoA measures have also been found to be correlated (r = .29-.91) between 35þ languages, including Arabic, Chinese, Gaelic, English, and Persian for pictures of objects and actions (Łuniewska et al, 2016, 2019), indicating the reliability and generality of adult ratings for AoA across cultures and languages.…”
Section: Cautionary Tales Of Aoa and Word Frequencymentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Morrison et al reported that there was a strong correlation (r = .75) between young adult AoA ratings and measures of objective AoA that were recorded from object naming in children. This is not limited to only British and American culture, and has been replicated and generalized (r = .50-.96) in several languages: Chinese, French, Icelandic, Italian, Kannada, Spanish, and Turkish (Álvarez & Cuetos, 2007;Bangalore et al, 2022;Chalard et al, 2003;Chedid et al, 2019;Göz et al, 2017;Li et al, 2022;Liu et al, 2011;Lotto et al, 2010;Montefinese et al, 2019;Perez & Navalon, 2005;Pind et al, 2000;Pind & Tryggvadóttir, 2002). Recently, these AoA measures have also been found to be correlated (r = .29-.91) between 35þ languages, including Arabic, Chinese, Gaelic, English, and Persian for pictures of objects and actions (Łuniewska et al, 2016, 2019), indicating the reliability and generality of adult ratings for AoA across cultures and languages.…”
Section: Cautionary Tales Of Aoa and Word Frequencymentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Chinese, French, Icelandic, Italian, Kannada, Spanish and Turkish (Álvarez & Cuetos, 2007;Bangalore et al, 2022;Chalard et al, 2003;Chedid et al, 2019;Göz et al, 2017;Li et al, 2022;Liu et al, 2011;Lotto et al, 2010;Montefinese et al, 2019;Perez & Navalon, 2005;Pind et al, 2000;Pind & Tryggvadóttir, 2002). Recently, these AoA measures have also been found to be correlated (r = .29-.91) between 35+ languages, including Arabic, Chinese, Gaelic, English and Persian for pictures of objects and actions (Łuniewska et al, 2016, 2019), indicating the reliability and generality of adult ratings for AoA across cultures and languages.…”
Section: The Mapping Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%