CBPR Implementation Framework for Community‐Academic Partnerships

Sánchez, Victoria; Sanchez-Youngman, Shannon; Dickson, Elizabeth; Burgess, Ellen; Haozous, Emily A.; Trickett, Edison J.; Baker, Elizabeth A.; Wallerstein, Nina

doi:10.1002/ajcp.12506

Cited by 32 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 25 publications

(31 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Lastly, the Adaptation Team members noted during the qualitative interview that they felt their expertise and suggestions were valued throughout the adaptation process. Collective empowerment and internal power-sharing are key components of community-based participatory research methods and may be one strategy for advancing social change and promoting health equity (Sánchez et al, 2021; Wallerstein et al, 2020).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Findings from a Structured Adaptation Process for the SafeCare Parenting Program to Address Family Needs in a Diverse Refugee Community

Self‐Brown

Weeks

Perry

et al. 2022

Research on Social Work Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social workers can promote resiliency among refugee families by referring them to evidence-based programs to reduce the stressors of resettlement. The purpose of this study was to complete a structured adaptation process with the SafeCare® program for implementation in a refugee resettlement community. Participants included 21 members of an adaptation team made up of administrators, supervisors, and family service providers from three community agencies and community health workers. Quantitative findings suggested that content, process, and literacy-related adaptations were necessary to ensure cultural relevance of program materials. Qualitative feedback suggested the adaptation approach was a meaningful process that engaged community members and resulted in an acceptable and feasible curriculum for delivery in the refugee resettlement community, which will be further tested in a forthcoming implementation trial. The multi-pronged, community-engaged approach to SafeCare adaptation is presented as a potential framework for other programs that could benefit refugee children and their families.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Findings from a Structured Adaptation Process for the SafeCare Parenting Program to Address Family Needs in a Diverse Refugee Community

Self‐Brown

Weeks

Perry

et al. 2022

Research on Social Work Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Data collection was initiated by [Details omitted for blind peer-review] as part of their biannual survey of refugee experiences in San Diego county. The research and survey design process was designed in line with a community based participatory research (CBPR) framework, particularly the intervention and research process and outputs described by Wallerstein et al ( Belone et al, 2016 ; Cashman et al, 2008 ; Sanchez et al, 2021 ; Wallerstein & Duran, 2010 ). Individual items were selected by centering community knowledge and preferences and then selecting measures that would increase the likelihood of generalizability and comparability between the refugee community and broader US population (e.g., selecting items from the US Census, American Community Survey, and the National Institute of Health PhenX toolkit) ( Hamilton et al, 2011 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on refugee communities in San Diego, California: A participatory action research cross-sectional study

McDougal

Erikat

Yusufi

et al. 2022

SSM - Population Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Wallerstein et al, 2019), democratic decision-making processes (e.g. Gone et al, 2020;S anchez-Youngman, 2021), and professional and personal development opportunities for non-academic partners (e.g. Espinosa et al, 2020).…”

Section: Power and Structurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…CEnR, for example, is often described as a "spectrum" encapsulating a range of approaches including CBPR (Brenner & Manice, 2011;McCloskey et al, 2011). In this depiction, CBPR represents one end of the spectrum, distinctive for its emphasis on maximizing the involvement of those affected by the issue under study and for its goal of ameliorating inequitable social conditions (Brenner & Manice, 2011;S anchez et al, 2021). Others, however, use the term CBPR simply because it is the term used most often in their field (Drahota et al, 2016), and recent studies have suggested that the high levels of community involvement characteristic of CBPR are not necessarily practiced in all projects (Spears Johnson et al, 2016).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Community‐engaged Research Approaches: Multiple Pathways To Health Equity

Haapanen

Christens

2021

American J of Comm Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The last few decades have seen growing acceptance and use of research approaches involving non-academic partners. As reflected in the two recent special issues/sections of this journal addressing community-based participatory research (CBPR; Suarez-Balcazar et al., 2020;Wallerstein, 2021), these approaches have moved fairly rapidly from the fringes of scholarly conversations to their current position in multiple disciplinary mainstreams, particularly in public health and community psychology. Termed variously (e.g., CBPR, participatory action research; PAR; and community-university partnerships), communityengaged approaches to research (CEnR approaches) now appear in wide range of academic funding mechanisms and research programs, many of which target conditions associated with health inequities.With the benefits and validity of CEnR becoming more established in the mainstream, we are seeing scholarly conversations focus increasingly on the training, funding, incentivization, and evaluation of these collaborative and partnership approaches. The Engage for Equity: Advancing Community Engaged Partnerships (E2) project, for example, has advanced a science of CBPR (Wallerstein et al., 2020), providing a conceptual foundation and model for linking partnership contexts and dynamics to intermediate and long-term health equity outcomes (Kastelic et al 2018;Wallerstein et al., 2008). Developed empirically from two large surveys of research partnerships and community consultations (Belone et al., 2016), their conceptual CBPR model identifies a range of factors including communities' and universities' capacity and readiness, historical context of collaboration, formal agreements, and congruence of partners' core values that may predict positive system and capacity outcomes. This framework provides a strong, unifying foundation for the growing field of CEnR, capturing much of what has been learned about effective partnerships in the last few decades.Surveying this special section (Wallerstein, 2021), the recent special issue on CBPR approaches to health equity (Suarez-Balcazar, et al., 2020) and the broader landscape of CEnR literature, however, we are struck by the breadth of collaborative structures, partner roles, group processes, research methodologies, and types of actions being employed in these projects. While rooted in the values that are often considered fundamental to CEnR (challenging dominant assumptions about who holds and creates knowledge; Wallerstein & Duran, 2018; involving actions that benefit all partners; Israel et al., 1998), these projects are otherwise remarkably diverse in their strategies. We question, therefore, whether unifying language and frameworks will continue to support this growing discourse.Over time, various terms have emerged to describe certain CEnR approaches. Some, such as Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR), have provided a platform for researchers to discuss the specific assumptions, strategies, and challenges of engaging youth in research. Others, such as CBPR and CEnR, are w...

show abstract

CBPR Implementation Framework for Community‐Academic Partnerships

Abstract: Highlights• Community-based participatory research can enhance implementation science.• The CBPR framework facilitates collective empowerment in community/academic partnerships.• Participants noted how the CBPR model and flexibility of tools can improve partnering practices.

Cited by 32 publications

References 25 publications

Findings from a Structured Adaptation Process for the SafeCare Parenting Program to Address Family Needs in a Diverse Refugee Community

Findings from a Structured Adaptation Process for the SafeCare Parenting Program to Address Family Needs in a Diverse Refugee Community

Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on refugee communities in San Diego, California: A participatory action research cross-sectional study

Community‐engaged Research Approaches: Multiple Pathways To Health Equity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About