CBPR and Nursing: Are You Ready?

Enriquez, Maithe; Remy, Laura; O’Connor, Jennifer J.

doi:10.1177/0193945918780701

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Given this truth, we are wholly committed to capturing the authentic voice of community residents' experiences with barriers related to weight (loss) goals, as well as diabetes prevention or control, to generate evidencebased recommendations for providers. Public health and advancedpractice nurses are in an ideal and unique position to embrace the methodology of CBPR because community involvement gives voice to the priority issues as lived by community members (Enriquez et al, 2018). Health promotion interventions are most successful when they are faith-based (Hye-Cheon Kim et al, 2008), and nurses can design the most ideal interventions for vulnerable populations.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community‐Based Participatory Research partnership with faith‐based organizations to address obesity and glucose control

Stokes

Wilson

2021

Public Health Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To explore the lived (narrative) experience of obesity and/or diabetes mellitus within focus groups consisting of individuals and community support persons residing in Genesee County, Michigan.Design: Qualitative study, using Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) methodology to design and conduct focus group interviews. Sample: Nineteen participants from faith-based organizations (FBOs) in GeneseeCounty (74.5% Caucasian, 3.0% Hispanic American).Measurements: Semi-structured narrative focus group interviews, using thematic coding and qualitative analysis software (Otter.com).Results: Participants from diverse FBOs revealed barriers that prevent them from reaching their weight goals and preventing or controlling diabetes. A shared theme included the concern that providers do not actively inquire about patient concerns at appointments, and they fail to offer practical strategies beyond pharmaceutical interventions. Conclusion:Focus group interviews with community residents revealed issues and barriers patients and their support persons face in health care experiences. Utilizing CBPR (methodology) is an opportunity for advanced practice nurses (health care professionals) to co-create strategies and interventions with the community that can assist them in successfully reaching their weight loss and diabetes prevention goals.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community‐Based Participatory Research partnership with faith‐based organizations to address obesity and glucose control

Stokes

Wilson

2021

Public Health Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Today, the use and support for CBPR for community health programs continue to rise 21. CBPR is also being applied within medical and nursing settings to create patient-centered outcomes, enhance clinical trials, and address health disparities 22,23. Moving forward, there is a need to build sustainability of partnerships and programs, as well as understanding what organizational capacities are necessary for CBPR to be successful 24…”

Section: Participation and Community Engagementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Highlighting Contributions of Behavioral and Social Sciences in Advancing Public Health: Where We've Come, Where We're Headed

Alber

Green

Gambescia

et al. 2020

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context: Social and behavioral sciences, a cross-disciplinary field that examines the interaction among behavioral, biological, environmental, and social factors, has contributed immensely to some public health achievements over the last century. Through collaboration with community organizations and partners, social and behavioral scientists have conducted numerous program interventions involving community engagement and advocacy efforts at the local, state, federal, and international levels. Contributions of Social and Behavioral Sciences: This article traces select historical underpinnings of the applications of social and behavioral sciences theories and evidence to public health and highlights 4 areas in which health education specialists have distinctly contributed to public health achievements by building on theory and evidence. Applied social and behavioral sciences have formed the basis of various health education interventions. These 4 areas include the following: (1) Theory, Model Development, and the Professionalization of Health Education; (2) Participation and Community Engagement;(3) Health Communication; and (4) Advocacy and Policy. Discussion: We present contemporary challenges and recommendations for strengthening the theory, research, and practice of health education within the context of social and behavioral sciences in addressing emerging public health issues.

show abstract

“…It has been acknowledged that people's health cannot be improved without improving social issues in communities (Marmot & Allen, 2014). Enriquez, Remy and O'Connor (2018) supported CBPR as a type of approach that would be ideal for addressing difficult and complex health issues which are heavily influenced by social and ecological determinants of health. They also support the involvement of communities identifying interventions and strategies that work best for them.…”

Section: Cbpr a Grassroots Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Such an approach is particularly useful in nursing research when exploring and addressing health inequities among marginalised and disadvantaged communities (Israel et al, 1998(Israel et al, , 2001(Israel et al, , 2005(Israel et al, , 2013. Enriquez, Remy and O'Connor (2018) supported CBPR as a type of approach that would be ideal for addressing difficult and complex health issues which are heavily influenced by social and ecological determinants of health. They stated that "the discipline of nursing is perfectly positioned and uniquely qualified to embrace this participatory approach, significantly contribute to improved health outcomes, and eliminate health disparities.…”

Section: Cbpr Valuable In Health and Nursing Curriculumsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The NINR is one of 27 Institutes at the National Institutes at the National Institutes of Health, the medical research agency of the USA. Other resources available to nurses to learn more about the CBPR approach include online modules at the Medical University of South Carolina, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, and the University of Minnesota(Enriquez, Remy & O'Connor, 2018).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Shining A Light On Pacific Children’s High Rates Of Ambulatory Sensitive Hospitalisations In New Zealand: Parents’ Perspectives

Rasch¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AbstractThe overwhelming statistics and the growing evidence on the burden of ill health experienced by Pacific children in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) is difficult to comprehend, particularly when the NZ health system is regarded to be one of the best and of good standard internationally. The persistent high rates of ambulatory sensitive hospitalisations (ASH) for Pacific children in NZ has provided a more contextual and a better perspective of the burden of poor health experienced by Pacific children for many years. ASH for children often result from minor, acute illnesses with abrupt onsets which are arguably preventable with timely and effective interventions in ambulatory and primary health care settings. However the issue is much more complicated for NZ children. The persistent ASH gap between ethnic groups consequently contributes to child health inequality in NZ. ASH are indicators of quality health care received in primary health care settings and reducing childhood ASH is a health priority in NZ. The shocking child health statistics paint a sad and disturbing picture on the health of Pacific children who grew up and have made NZ their home. The lack of research on the persistent and excessive ASH rates on Pacific children warrants the need for this study. Events related to Pacific children age 1 month – 14 years admitted with a health condition considered preventable were explored in this study, by gaining insights into the perspectives of parents. The aims were to describe parents and children’s experiences, identify healthcare priorities for Pacific children, and explore solutions or what could be done differently to reduce ASH rates for this population group. The research also aimed to enhance Pacific community and nursing capacity by supporting participation in a child health research project. A qualitative multi-method design informed by a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach was utilised in this study. The research involved establishing a partnership between parents, nurses, and myself (PhD candidate) to yield knowledge to better understand Pacific children’s hospital admissions that are considered preventable. The study involved four sequential phases: 1: Development of a research partnership with Pacific nurses in a form of a Pacific Nurses Research Advisory Group (PNRAG) (n=12); 2: Semi-structured interviews with parents (n=25) of children who had a potentially avoidable admission; 3: Parents group meetings (n=5) using nominal group techniques; and 4: Dissemination and translation of findings to inform interventions. Three District Health Boards with high Pacific populations were the localities for the study. Analysis used content and thematic techniques for Phase 2, and nominal analysis processes for Phase 3. Phase 4 is ongoing. Results: Children’s primary reasons for hospital admissions were, Respiratory (n=9), Skin health (n=8), Oral health (n=4), Other (n=4). Multiple factors contributed to children’s hospital admissions. Significant areas highlighted in the research findings were centred on parents’ limited knowledge on children’s health conditions, lack of confidence voicing their concerns and inadequate support by health workers. Health workforce and health literacy are critical contributing factors. The CBPR approach in partnership with parents and the PNRAG lifted the authenticity of the research. Dissemination: Results from this research are being shared with Pacific nurses, primary care providers, and children’s health providers in anticipation that the insights provided into strategies, methods and interventions once implemented will reduce high rates of ASH and improve Pacific children’s health outcomes. Conclusion: The collective experiences and perspectives from Pacific nurses and parents of Pacific children provides valuable insights of small and large interventions that, if addressed, has the potential to make a positive impact on the lives of Pacific children and reduce ASH rates by Pacific children.

show abstract

CBPR and Nursing: Are You Ready?

Cited by 4 publications

References 8 publications

Community‐Based Participatory Research partnership with faith‐based organizations to address obesity and glucose control

Community‐Based Participatory Research partnership with faith‐based organizations to address obesity and glucose control

Highlighting Contributions of Behavioral and Social Sciences in Advancing Public Health: Where We've Come, Where We're Headed

Shining A Light On Pacific Children’s High Rates Of Ambulatory Sensitive Hospitalisations In New Zealand: Parents’ Perspectives

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About