“…">To account for the amount and type of amino acid interactions involved in the interfaces between α/β‐globins, α‐globin and AHSP, along with the contacts with the heme and the allosteric modulator 2,3‐DPG, RING (Martin et al, ), and LPC/CSU softwares (Sobolev, Sorokine, Prilusky, Abola, & Edelman, ) were employed. - O 2 gate access involved residues were analyzed in different conformations, considering the available data (Boechi et al, ; Bringas, Petruk, Estrin, Capece, & Martí, ), and pockets and cavities estimation was performed using FPocket and CavityPlus programs (Le Guilloux, Schmidtke, & Tuffery, ; Xu et al, ).
- Missense variants were also analyzed with the sequence‐based predictors PROVEAN (http://provean.jcvi.org/index.php; Choi & Chan, ), SIFT (http://siftdna.org/www/Extended_SIFT_chr_coords_submit.html; Sim et al, ), Panther (http://www.pantherdb.org/tools/csnpScore.do; Mi, Muruganujan, & Thomas, ), SNAP2 (https://open.predictprotein.org/; Bromberg & Rost, ), and with the sequence‐ and structure‐based PolyPhen‐2 (HumVar trained model) (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/; Adzhubei et al, ).
…”