2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2018.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cavity effects on the Fermi velocity renormalization in a graphene sheet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the renormalization of v F is straightforward within this quantum-electrodynamical approach. Indeed, in similar systems, the use of quantum field theory techniques has been shown very useful for describing electronic properties in both perturbative [4,5,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and nonperturbative [6][7][8][22][23][24][25][26] approaches. In particular, the random phase approximation (RPA), which is equivalent to leading order in the 1=N approximation [6], has been used in the description of some properties of suspended [8,26] and doped [25,27,28] graphene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the renormalization of v F is straightforward within this quantum-electrodynamical approach. Indeed, in similar systems, the use of quantum field theory techniques has been shown very useful for describing electronic properties in both perturbative [4,5,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and nonperturbative [6][7][8][22][23][24][25][26] approaches. In particular, the random phase approximation (RPA), which is equivalent to leading order in the 1=N approximation [6], has been used in the description of some properties of suspended [8,26] and doped [25,27,28] graphene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PQED has been demonstrated to be unitary [28], local [29] and has been successfully applied to describe several properties of graphene. Among others, we highlight the Fermi velocity renormalization in the absence [12] or in the presence [14] of a magnetic field in the vicinity of a conducting plate [30] or in a cav-ity [31]. In addition, it provided a theoretical description of the Quantum Valley Hall Effect, quantum corrections for the longitudinal conductivity in graphene [13], and of the corrections to the electron's g-factor due to interactions [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Because of that, it has been applied to describe the electromagnetic interaction in 2D materials, such as graphene [43][44][45][46], silicene [47], and transition metal dichalcogenides [47][48][49][50][51]. Within the myriad of results it has given rise to, we allude in hindsight to dynamical mass generation for fermion at zero and finite temperature [52][53][54], interaction-driven quantum valley Hall effect [55], quantum corrections of the electron g-factor [56], electron-hole pairing (excitons) in transition metal dichalcogenides [57,58], optical infrared conductivity of graphene [59], emergence of a dynami-cally generated mass with Gross-Neveu interaction [60], Yukawa potential in the plane [61,62], and PQED cavity effects [63,64].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%