2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.122.123602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cavity Cooling of a Levitated Nanosphere by Coherent Scattering

Abstract: We report three-dimensional cooling of a levitated nanoparticle inside an optical cavity. The cooling mechanism is provided by cavity-enhanced coherent scattering off an optical tweezer. The observed 3D dynamics and cooling rates are as theoretically expected from the presence of both linear and quadratic terms in the interaction between the particle motion and the cavity field. By achieving nanometer-level control over the particle location we optimize the position-dependent coupling and demonstrate axial coo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
192
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
192
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A comment in this regard is useful: while our calculations assume parameters typical of levitated mechanical systems [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] and within the grasp or well foreseeable in membrane-based [42] or graphene-based [43] experimental settings, challenges are posed by the arrangement of the geometric configuration specific of our proposal. While the asymmetry of the bidimensional motion addressed in our study does not represent a true difficulty (asymmetric trapping potentials for levitated optomechanical systems are routinely used in current experiments), the small values of the distance between S1 and S2 is the crucial point that requires care.…”
Section: Revelation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comment in this regard is useful: while our calculations assume parameters typical of levitated mechanical systems [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] and within the grasp or well foreseeable in membrane-based [42] or graphene-based [43] experimental settings, challenges are posed by the arrangement of the geometric configuration specific of our proposal. While the asymmetry of the bidimensional motion addressed in our study does not represent a true difficulty (asymmetric trapping potentials for levitated optomechanical systems are routinely used in current experiments), the small values of the distance between S1 and S2 is the crucial point that requires care.…”
Section: Revelation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, we turn our attention to a system where also the next component is relevant-a levitated particle squeezed by a combination of parametric and dissipative squeezing [36]. The potential for the particle's centre-of-mass motion is defined by the laser beam used for levitation; its scattering into an empty cavity mode provides the optomechanical interaction [46,51,57]. To achieve strong squeezing, the optical tweezer amplitude is modulated at twice the mechanical frequency, E tw (t) = E 0 [1 + α cos(2ω m t)], where α ∈ (0, 1) is the modulation depth, modulating both the mechanical potential and the optomechanical coupling rate.…”
Section: B Parametric and Dissipative Squeezing For A Levitated Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now aim to find the threshold of the total laser pump power ζ tot = M ζ for selfordering at the self-consistent temperature T st as a function of χ. Remembering that the stationary state can be approximated by a thermal state in typical parameter regimes [26], we assume that the stationary state is a Boltzmann distribution with the temperature T st and the mean-field potential given in Eq. (8). To obtain the self-consistent cavity fields creating this potential, we employ the method introduced in Ref.…”
Section: Self-ordering Threshold From a Mean-field Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%