1998
DOI: 10.1006/jfls.1997.0120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cavitation Models for Structures Excited by a Plane Shock Wave

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, we have seen that the pressure in some regions of the internal fluid can be negative. This suggests the possibility of cavitation, since it is known that water, for example, cannot withstand significant tension, and will start to cavitate if pressure falls below a certain critical value (maximum tension water can withstand for very short times is in the 10-100 kPa range [e.g., Makinen (1998)]). Cavitation in the systems of the type considered is a significant engineering concern, and is a challenging phenomenon to study from the researcher's perspective.…”
Section: Cavitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Namely, we have seen that the pressure in some regions of the internal fluid can be negative. This suggests the possibility of cavitation, since it is known that water, for example, cannot withstand significant tension, and will start to cavitate if pressure falls below a certain critical value (maximum tension water can withstand for very short times is in the 10-100 kPa range [e.g., Makinen (1998)]). Cavitation in the systems of the type considered is a significant engineering concern, and is a challenging phenomenon to study from the researcher's perspective.…”
Section: Cavitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…if the cavitating region does not interact with the shell surface), it usually leads to structure reloading after the cavitation zone collapses [e.g., Wardlaw and Luton (2000)]. If the cavitation region is adjacent to the shell surface, separation of the latter from the fluid occurs leading to much higher displacements and deformations [e.g., Makinen (1998)]. When the shell and fluid come in contact again, shell reloading takes place with the pressures comparable to those of the initial shock loading.…”
Section: Cavitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that cavitation is a possibility for intense enough incident loads [e.g., Makinen (1998), Wardlaw and Luton (2000), and Mair (1999a)]. If cavitation does develop, the subsequent collapse of the cavitation region or/and separation of the shell from the fluid, both often leading to significant reloading of the shell, will considerably change the overall dynamics of the process.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…' In addition to analytical studies, much work also exists on the numerical modeling of the underwater shock or underwater explosion response of plates. Makinen [5] used the plane wave approximation to model the fluid during the shock-loading phase and compared results using different cavitation models. The result showed that the most important factor for the impact pressure on the structure is the driving pressure for the growth of the cavity, and the reloading time is critical for the structural response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%