2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cavitation erosion by shockwave self-focusing of a single bubble

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, the bubble dynamics are significantly damaging only for . This has been previously reported and is a result of shockwave self-focusing during the collapse [6] . The highest damage is found here for .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Clearly, the bubble dynamics are significantly damaging only for . This has been previously reported and is a result of shockwave self-focusing during the collapse [6] . The highest damage is found here for .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Here we assume that the material removal mainly occurs in the passive film through a skimming mechanism, i.e., layer-like progression induced by the shear stresses. Some weight-lossless plastic deformation in the form of indentation is also expected [6] though this limited plastic deformation could not result in formation of cracks or material removal in the form of detached particles on the surface of ductile aluminium. As the surface will be quickly repassivated after the bubble collapse, the weight loss of the sample due to the removal of passive layer is roughly equal to the weight of elementary aluminium which reacts with oxygen, i.e., Δw in the Faraday equation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations