1974
DOI: 10.2307/1477601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caveat on Causes and Correlations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…My goal in this article is to produce such an overview by summarizing Lomax’s own work and its criticisms in light of these recent studies and related developments that have occurred during the half century since Lomax began his work. Because Lomax’s forays into dance (choreometrics) and other domains were less comprehensive and more heavily criticized than his flagship cantometric analysis of traditional folk songs (e.g., Kaeppler, 1978; Kealiinohomoku, 1974; Williams, 1974; Youngerman, 1974), I will focus the bulk of the article primarily on cantometrics, but I will also suggest possibilities for re-extending the analysis into other domains of art and culture. By understanding why Lomax’s vision of an interdisciplinary, global synthesis of science and art failed to take off half a century ago, we may find ourselves better able to try a new approach in today’s new intellectual climate of revived interest in the digital humanities and cultural evolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My goal in this article is to produce such an overview by summarizing Lomax’s own work and its criticisms in light of these recent studies and related developments that have occurred during the half century since Lomax began his work. Because Lomax’s forays into dance (choreometrics) and other domains were less comprehensive and more heavily criticized than his flagship cantometric analysis of traditional folk songs (e.g., Kaeppler, 1978; Kealiinohomoku, 1974; Williams, 1974; Youngerman, 1974), I will focus the bulk of the article primarily on cantometrics, but I will also suggest possibilities for re-extending the analysis into other domains of art and culture. By understanding why Lomax’s vision of an interdisciplinary, global synthesis of science and art failed to take off half a century ago, we may find ourselves better able to try a new approach in today’s new intellectual climate of revived interest in the digital humanities and cultural evolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…‘Lomax’s hypothesis’, Kealiinohomoku wrote, ‘is useful only for areas that are culturally homogenous, where there has been little acculturation and minimal technological change. Surely there are few such societies today’ (Kealiinohomoku, 1974). How, for example, could Choremetrics’ model account for the creolization occasioned not by media pollution, but by the arrival of West Africans in the Americas through the slave trade?…”
Section: Writing Practices Embodied History and The Ironies Of Cultumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contrasts between the choreametrics project in the 1960s (Lomax, 1968) and the approach to cultural study evidenced in Body, Movement andCulture, published in 1990 (Ness, 1990) demonstrate a significant advancement in the use ofLMA as a tool for anthropological analysis. Lomax's choreometrics project has been criticized for its speculative generalizations based on insufficient samples and its tendency to mistake correlation between work and dance actions for indication that the former causes the latter (Kealiinohomoku, 1974). Ness writes insightfully and sensitively about a ritual dance known as "Sinulog," performed throughout the Central Philipines, drawing from her own experiences, observations, and interviews to overtly identify her methods and point of view.…”
Section: Distilling the Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%