2021
DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cave amphipods reveal co‐variation between morphology and trophic niche in a low‐productivity environment

Abstract: 1. Identifying the relationships between morphology and trophic niche is at the core of functional morphology. Low resource diversity and fluxes of organic carbon are expected to constrain trophic specialisation of morphological structures because food resources are too scarce to promote trophic differentiation. However, species from low-productivity habitats often exhibit specialised biological traits such as resistance to starvation and high food-finding abilities, which may in turn release constraints on tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed general morphological similarity might either support true morphological crypsis or indicate that all studied individuals belong to the same species. As it was already presented for other amphipods, morphological traits accurately re ect occupied trophic niche [73][74][75][76] and therefore morphological similarity likely indicates the same ecological niche and similar use of available resources [82,83]. Since multiple species competing for the same resources are unlikely to coexist in the same (micro)habitat (according to the competitive exclusion principle), morphological evidence supports the hypothesis that co-occurring MOTUs of E. sicilianus in fact represent the same species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observed general morphological similarity might either support true morphological crypsis or indicate that all studied individuals belong to the same species. As it was already presented for other amphipods, morphological traits accurately re ect occupied trophic niche [73][74][75][76] and therefore morphological similarity likely indicates the same ecological niche and similar use of available resources [82,83]. Since multiple species competing for the same resources are unlikely to coexist in the same (micro)habitat (according to the competitive exclusion principle), morphological evidence supports the hypothesis that co-occurring MOTUs of E. sicilianus in fact represent the same species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…We examined morphological differentiation by measuring 49 traits that re ect diet, locomotion and reproduction [73][74][75][76](see Tab. S5).…”
Section: Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low survival rates of the surface species might be linked to both competition and predation by the stygobiont one, and suggests the need for a further control condition for the epigean species in future studies. Niphargus amphipods are often considered generalist species feeding on detritus (Luštrik et al 2011;Tachet 2010), but opportunistic predatory behaviours can be more frequent than usually reported (Ercoli et al 2019;Fišer et al 2010), and predator species have been recently recognised (Premate et al 2021). However, we never observed direct predation by Niphargus on E. stammeri.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined morphological differentiation by measuring 49 traits that reflect diet, locomotion and reproduction (Copilaș‐Ciocianu et al., 2021; Fišer et al., 2013; Kralj‐Fišer et al., 2020; Premate et al., 2021) (Table S5). A complete description of landmarks and function of the examined traits is provided in Copilaș‐Ciocianu et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%