2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.06.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caution With the Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII in Treating Postoperative Hemorrhage in Cardiac Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some stakeholders emphasized their personal experiences with rFVIIa and the number of positive case reports published . Others emphasized the physiological rationale for using rFVIIa to treat bleeding in any context, while others were skeptical of the validity of clinical anecdotes, case reports, and mechanistic accounts and emphasized the necessity for practice to be based upon high‐level analyses, particularly randomized controlled trials . For instance, Veronica Yank and Randall S. Stafford stated that there was no convincing epidemiological evidence of rFVIIa's efficacy, leading them to “strongly caution against such wide adoption of off‐label therapeutics without convincing evidence of efficacy and adequate studies of harm.”…”
Section: Values and Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some stakeholders emphasized their personal experiences with rFVIIa and the number of positive case reports published . Others emphasized the physiological rationale for using rFVIIa to treat bleeding in any context, while others were skeptical of the validity of clinical anecdotes, case reports, and mechanistic accounts and emphasized the necessity for practice to be based upon high‐level analyses, particularly randomized controlled trials . For instance, Veronica Yank and Randall S. Stafford stated that there was no convincing epidemiological evidence of rFVIIa's efficacy, leading them to “strongly caution against such wide adoption of off‐label therapeutics without convincing evidence of efficacy and adequate studies of harm.”…”
Section: Values and Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%