2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2005.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes of the mid-latitude NmF2 winter anomaly at solar maximum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(88 reference statements)
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reach approximately the same level of the solar activity for summer and winter days, the difference between the winter and summer daily F10.7 solar activity indexes is taken to be less or equal to 20 in the statistical analysis. On the other hand, the value of NmF2 is a function of production and loss rate of unexcited and electronically excited O + ions (see, e.g., Pavlov and Pavlova, 2005). As a result, the F2-layer peak electron density depends on the neutral temperature and densities whose values are functions of F10.7 solar activity index for a previous day (Hedin, 1987).…”
Section: Statistical Study Of the Nmf2 Winter Anomaly: Results And DImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To reach approximately the same level of the solar activity for summer and winter days, the difference between the winter and summer daily F10.7 solar activity indexes is taken to be less or equal to 20 in the statistical analysis. On the other hand, the value of NmF2 is a function of production and loss rate of unexcited and electronically excited O + ions (see, e.g., Pavlov and Pavlova, 2005). As a result, the F2-layer peak electron density depends on the neutral temperature and densities whose values are functions of F10.7 solar activity index for a previous day (Hedin, 1987).…”
Section: Statistical Study Of the Nmf2 Winter Anomaly: Results And DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The daytime mid-latitude electron density of the F2-region is decreased up to a factor of 2-3 due to vibrationally excited N 2 and O 2 (Pavlov, 1998;Pavlov et al, 1999;Pavlov and Foster, 2001;Prolss and Werner, 2002). As a result, a part of the mid-latitude F2-layer winter anomaly can be attributed to the seasonal difference of the increase in the loss rate of O + ( 4 S) ions due to vibrationally excited N 2 and O 2 (Torr et al, 1980;Pavlov and Pavlova, 2005;Pavlov et al, 2008a, b).…”
Section: Statistical Study Of the Nmf2 Winter Anomaly: Results And DImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[2] Seasonal and December anomalies in N m F 2 variations have been studied since the beginning of ionospheric observations [Appleton and Naismith, 1935;Seaton and Berkner, 1939;Yonezawa and Arima, 1959]; however, the mechanisms of their formation are still discussed in publications [Richards et al, 1994c;Rishbeth et al, 2000;Richards, 2001;Kawamura et al, 2002;Yu et al, 2004;Pavlov and Pavlova, 2005;Rishbeth and Müller-Wodarg, 2006;Zhao et al, 2007]. Among different explanations proposed during the decades of the problem analysis [see Rishbeth, 1998], the suggestion by Rishbeth and Setty [1961] that F 2 layer seasonal anomaly is due to neutral composition variation may be considered as generally accepted [Rishbeth et al, 2000].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%