2021
DOI: 10.1177/0269094221995783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes of the gender divide within entrepreneurship ecosystems

Abstract: Knowledge about connections within a local economic system holds implication for understanding the ways in which individuals and categories of entrepreneurs access the system itself and resources provided within. While scholars have recently found complex divisions of networks within local entrepreneurship ecosystems, we still have a limited understanding about why these chasms exist. We present a case study with qualitative research in the entrepreneurial ecosystem of St. Louis, Missouri, which identifies str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the resources to become an entrepreneur are unequally distributed (Motoyama et al, 2021); there predominates a gender-based occupational segregation that expels women (above all the low-skilled) to less lucrative, more feminized service sectors, such as child care and hairdressing (Tonoyan et al, 2020); family responsibilities are unequally distributed; credit entities and clients also discriminate in the financing of these projects and access to resources (Guzman & Kacperczyk, 2019;Zhang et al, 2020); there are discontinuities in women's careers. These studies, which have brought to light factors that explain this subordination, have highlighted that female entrepreneurs face more problems when accessing and mobilizing the external resources (human, social and financial capital) necessary to start and maintain a company (Welter, 2004).…”
Section: Subjectivities Marked By Socioestructural Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the resources to become an entrepreneur are unequally distributed (Motoyama et al, 2021); there predominates a gender-based occupational segregation that expels women (above all the low-skilled) to less lucrative, more feminized service sectors, such as child care and hairdressing (Tonoyan et al, 2020); family responsibilities are unequally distributed; credit entities and clients also discriminate in the financing of these projects and access to resources (Guzman & Kacperczyk, 2019;Zhang et al, 2020); there are discontinuities in women's careers. These studies, which have brought to light factors that explain this subordination, have highlighted that female entrepreneurs face more problems when accessing and mobilizing the external resources (human, social and financial capital) necessary to start and maintain a company (Welter, 2004).…”
Section: Subjectivities Marked By Socioestructural Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies (Motoyama et al, 2021;Agarwal et al, 2020;Boldureanu et al, 2020;Stephany, et al, 2017;Uru et al, 2011;Suzana et al, 2014) have established that informal entrepreneurial education is a significant driver of economic growth, job creations, value creation, changing customers' behaviour, and critical in innovation and creativity. However, to the best of the researchers' knowledge, there is a dearth of literature on how informal entrepreneurial activities drive businesswomen's skills and economic sustainability.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each article explores a different dimension of Inclusive Innovation, drawing to light factors that can limit its potential and thus open a space for improved practice and policy. Motoyama et al (2021) engage the problem of gender-based exclusion within local entrepreneurial ecosystems. Through a case study of the St Louis (Missouri) metropolitan region, the authors show that local entrepreneurship initiatives reproduce patterns of gender disparity due to differences in access to entrepreneurship resources-not only formal resources but also informal networks within the local ecosystem, which are critical for enabling startup businesses to get established and grow.…”
Section: Overview Of the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%